vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CASELLA WASTE SYSTEMS INC (CWST) and Tempus AI, Inc. (TEM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CASELLA WASTE SYSTEMS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($469.1M vs $367.2M, roughly 1.3× Tempus AI, Inc.). CASELLA WASTE SYSTEMS INC runs the higher net margin — -0.5% vs -14.8%, a 14.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tempus AI, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (83.0% vs 9.7%). CASELLA WASTE SYSTEMS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($39.3M vs $-41.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Tempus AI, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (58.7% CAGR vs 17.3%).
Casella Waste Systems, Inc. is a waste management company based in Rutland, Vermont, United States. Founded in 1975 with a single truck, Casella is a regional, vertically integrated solid waste services company. Casella provides resource management expertise and services to residential, commercial, municipal and industrial customers, primarily in the areas of solid waste collection and disposal, transfer, recycling and organics services. The company provides integrated solid waste services in...
Tempus AI, Inc. is an American health technology company founded in 2015 by Eric Lefkofsky in Chicago, Illinois. It was established by Lefkofsky soon after his wife was diagnosed with breast cancer. Tempus uses data and artificial intelligence (AI) to create precision medicine services, including diagnostics, for oncology, cardiology, radiology, and depression. The company went public on the Nasdaq on June 14, 2024, under the ticker symbol "TEM."
CWST vs TEM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $469.1M | $367.2M |
| Net Profit | $-2.5M | $-54.2M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | -16.7% |
| Net Margin | -0.5% | -14.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.7% | 83.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -151.5% | -316.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | $-0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $469.1M | $367.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $485.4M | $334.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $465.3M | $314.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $417.1M | $255.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $427.5M | $200.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $411.6M | $180.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.2M | $166.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $341.0M | $145.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.5M | $-54.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0M | $-80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | $-42.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | $-68.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8M | $-75.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0M | $-552.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.1M | $-64.7M |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | -16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | -18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | -26.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | -25.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | -29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.1% | -321.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | -36.5% |
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | -14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | -23.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | -13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.2% | -26.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | -6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | -41.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -332.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.2% | -44.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.16 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.08 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $2.56 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.10 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $-6.86 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $-1.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $123.8M | $604.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $491.3M |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $123.8M | $604.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $192.7M | $655.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $217.8M | $186.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $267.7M | $151.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $358.3M | $341.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $519.0M | $388.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $208.5M | $478.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $189.5M | $79.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $976.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $980.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $491.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $507.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $309.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $326.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $56.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $53.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $98.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $-1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $926.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $971.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $864.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.96× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $96.6M | $-36.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $39.3M | $-41.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.4% | -11.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.2% | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.7M | $-239.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $96.6M | $-36.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.6M | $-119.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $89.5M | $44.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.1M | $-105.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.8M | $48.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.1M | $-97.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.7M | $-101.4M |
| Q4 25 | $39.3M | $-41.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.6M | $-126.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.1M | $36.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.4M | $-107.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.4M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.5M | $-105.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-22.6M | $-107.5M |
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | -11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | -37.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | -42.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | -63.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.6% | -73.7% |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.8% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.37× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.19× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.51× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.91× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.29× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CWST
| Transferred Over Time | $120.9M | 26% |
| Resource Solutions Region | $92.9M | 20% |
| Collection | $90.9M | 19% |
| Mid Atlantic Region | $89.6M | 19% |
| National Accounts | $60.9M | 13% |
| Landfill Revenue | $8.3M | 2% |
| Processing Services | $2.1M | 0% |
| Transportation | $1.4M | 0% |
TEM
Segment breakdown not available.
