vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CXApp Inc. (CXAI) and Laser Photonics Corp (LASE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CXApp Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0M vs $919.3K, roughly 1.1× Laser Photonics Corp). Laser Photonics Corp runs the higher net margin — -506.4% vs -544.1%, a 37.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laser Photonics Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.3% vs -38.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Laser Photonics Corp's revenue compounded faster (-3.9% CAGR vs -25.0%).
CXApp Inc. is a technology firm specializing in digital workplace experience solutions. It offers cloud-based software tools for employee engagement, office space optimization, visitor management, and hybrid work coordination, serving mid-to-large enterprises across North America, APAC and Europe.
IPG Photonics Corporation is a manufacturer of fiber lasers. IPG Photonics developed and commercialized optical fiber lasers, which are used in a variety of applications including materials processing, medical applications and telecommunications. IPG has manufacturing facilities in the United States, Germany, Russia and Italy.
CXAI vs LASE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0M | $919.3K |
| Net Profit | $-5.6M | $-4.7M |
| Gross Margin | 86.9% | -20.1% |
| Operating Margin | -576.9% | -350.0% |
| Net Margin | -544.1% | -506.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -38.5% | 28.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -56.7% | -186.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $919.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $716.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $623.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $743.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-5.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.2M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.1M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.5M | $586.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.4M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-934.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.2M | $-545.7K |
| Q4 25 | 86.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 89.0% | -20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.0% | 53.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 87.7% | 49.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 86.0% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.4% | 85.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.0% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 82.0% | 51.9% |
| Q4 25 | -576.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -343.4% | -350.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -336.1% | -37.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -306.0% | -68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -169.7% | -255.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -194.3% | -238.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -206.7% | -149.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -197.3% | -73.8% |
| Q4 25 | -544.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -283.4% | -506.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -256.7% | -68.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -132.0% | -73.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -213.6% | 45.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -286.5% | -226.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -297.6% | -149.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -284.4% | -73.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.1M | $3.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.0M | $4.1M |
| Total Assets | $32.4M | $17.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9M | $78.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $179.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9M | $533.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $14.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.2M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.3M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.6M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.6M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.6M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.3M | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.9M | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | $32.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.5M | $17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.6M | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.8M | $17.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $13.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.6M | $763.1K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -355.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-10.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.8M | $763.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.0M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-979.0K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $632.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-650.0K | $-866.3K |
| Q4 25 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-984.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $589.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-668.0K | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | -355.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -248.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -247.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -80.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -109.3% | 82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -108.6% | -388.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -36.7% | -136.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 20.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -11.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
