vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Crexendo, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.1M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.4× Laird Superfood, Inc.). Crexendo, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.7% vs -13.2%, a 19.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs 11.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 12.4%).
Crexendo, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered cloud communications technology provider. It delivers unified communications as a service (UCaaS), contact center solutions, business VoIP services, and collaborative work tools, primarily catering to small and medium-sized enterprises operating in the North American market.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
CXDO vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.1M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.2M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 6.7% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.2% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 140.2% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $18.1M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.5M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.6M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.2M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.3M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $507.0K | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $148.0K | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $588.0K | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $434.0K | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.3% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $114.0K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $63.8M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $77.7M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $114.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $356.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $475.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $709.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $823.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $937.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $63.8M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.3M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.3M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.2M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.4M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.2M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.8M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $77.7M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.0M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.4M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.4M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.9M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.3M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.6M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $57.5M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.02× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.3M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.93× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-166.0K | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.93× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.95× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.51× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.38× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CXDO
| Services | $8.6M | 48% |
| Software Solution Segment | $8.3M | 46% |
| Products | $1.1M | 6% |
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
