vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) and NATURES SUNSHINE PRODUCTS INC (NATR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Sprinklr, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($219.1M vs $123.8M, roughly 1.8× NATURES SUNSHINE PRODUCTS INC). NATURES SUNSHINE PRODUCTS INC runs the higher net margin — 3.3% vs 1.3%, a 2.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sprinklr, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.2% vs 4.7%). Sprinklr, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($19.8M vs $7.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Sprinklr, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.2% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Sprinklr is an American software company that develops a software as a service (SaaS) customer experience management (CXM) platform. The company's software, also called Sprinklr, combines different applications for social media marketing, social advertising, content management, collaboration, employee advocacy, customer care, social media research, and social media monitoring.

Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. also known as "NSP", is a manufacturer of dietary supplements, including herbs, vitamins, minerals, and personal care products. It is based in Lehi, Utah, with a manufacturing facility in Spanish Fork, Utah.

CXM vs NATR — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CXM
CXM
1.8× larger
CXM
$219.1M
$123.8M
NATR
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
CXM
CXM
+4.4% gap
CXM
9.2%
4.7%
NATR
Higher net margin
NATR
NATR
2.0% more per $
NATR
3.3%
1.3%
CXM
More free cash flow
CXM
CXM
$12.2M more FCF
CXM
$19.8M
$7.6M
NATR
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
CXM
CXM
Annualised
CXM
6.2%
5.6%
NATR

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CXM
CXM
NATR
NATR
Revenue
$219.1M
$123.8M
Net Profit
$2.9M
$4.1M
Gross Margin
66.4%
72.5%
Operating Margin
5.3%
4.3%
Net Margin
1.3%
3.3%
Revenue YoY
9.2%
4.7%
Net Profit YoY
-72.2%
1379.4%
EPS (diluted)
$0.01
$0.23

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CXM
CXM
NATR
NATR
Q4 25
$219.1M
$123.8M
Q3 25
$212.0M
$128.3M
Q2 25
$205.5M
$114.8M
Q1 25
$202.5M
$113.2M
Q4 24
$200.7M
$118.2M
Q3 24
$197.2M
$114.6M
Q2 24
$196.0M
$110.6M
Q1 24
$194.2M
$111.0M
Net Profit
CXM
CXM
NATR
NATR
Q4 25
$2.9M
$4.1M
Q3 25
$12.6M
$5.3M
Q2 25
$-1.6M
$5.3M
Q1 25
$98.7M
$4.7M
Q4 24
$10.5M
$-321.0K
Q3 24
$1.8M
$4.3M
Q2 24
$10.6M
$1.3M
Q1 24
$21.1M
$2.3M
Gross Margin
CXM
CXM
NATR
NATR
Q4 25
66.4%
72.5%
Q3 25
68.2%
73.3%
Q2 25
69.5%
71.7%
Q1 25
71.0%
72.1%
Q4 24
71.2%
72.0%
Q3 24
72.6%
71.3%
Q2 24
73.9%
71.4%
Q1 24
75.5%
71.2%
Operating Margin
CXM
CXM
NATR
NATR
Q4 25
5.3%
4.3%
Q3 25
7.7%
7.0%
Q2 25
-0.9%
3.7%
Q1 25
5.2%
5.4%
Q4 24
3.9%
3.8%
Q3 24
-0.0%
4.6%
Q2 24
2.9%
5.1%
Q1 24
9.5%
4.2%
Net Margin
CXM
CXM
NATR
NATR
Q4 25
1.3%
3.3%
Q3 25
5.9%
4.2%
Q2 25
-0.8%
4.6%
Q1 25
48.7%
4.2%
Q4 24
5.2%
-0.3%
Q3 24
0.9%
3.8%
Q2 24
5.4%
1.2%
Q1 24
10.9%
2.1%
EPS (diluted)
CXM
CXM
NATR
NATR
Q4 25
$0.01
$0.23
Q3 25
$0.05
$0.30
Q2 25
$-0.01
$0.28
Q1 25
$0.35
$0.25
Q4 24
$0.04
$-0.02
Q3 24
$0.01
$0.23
Q2 24
$0.04
$0.07
Q1 24
$0.07
$0.12

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CXM
CXM
NATR
NATR
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$189.6M
$93.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$558.1M
$161.6M
Total Assets
$1.1B
$261.1M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CXM
CXM
NATR
NATR
Q4 25
$189.6M
$93.9M
Q3 25
$125.4M
$95.6M
Q2 25
$126.4M
$81.3M
Q1 25
$145.3M
$86.5M
Q4 24
$93.2M
$84.7M
Q3 24
$119.1M
$78.7M
Q2 24
$126.8M
$68.7M
Q1 24
$164.0M
$77.8M
Total Debt
CXM
CXM
NATR
NATR
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
$2.1M
Stockholders' Equity
CXM
CXM
NATR
NATR
Q4 25
$558.1M
$161.6M
Q3 25
$543.4M
$166.7M
Q2 25
$639.8M
$163.7M
Q1 25
$612.1M
$167.1M
Q4 24
$497.0M
$161.0M
Q3 24
$469.0M
$162.6M
Q2 24
$610.9M
$156.4M
Q1 24
$679.7M
$159.7M
Total Assets
CXM
CXM
NATR
NATR
Q4 25
$1.1B
$261.1M
Q3 25
$1.1B
$264.8M
Q2 25
$1.2B
$254.9M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$252.7M
Q4 24
$970.3M
$240.9M
Q3 24
$983.8M
$245.3M
Q2 24
$1.1B
$235.8M
Q1 24
$1.2B
$247.3M
Debt / Equity
CXM
CXM
NATR
NATR
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
0.01×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CXM
CXM
NATR
NATR
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$20.0M
$9.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$19.8M
$7.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
9.0%
6.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.1%
1.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
6.87×
2.41×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$142.3M
$28.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CXM
CXM
NATR
NATR
Q4 25
$20.0M
$9.9M
Q3 25
$34.8M
$18.5M
Q2 25
$83.8M
$4.3M
Q1 25
$5.4M
$2.6M
Q4 24
$9.2M
$12.2M
Q3 24
$21.3M
$9.6M
Q2 24
$41.7M
$1.3M
Q1 24
$17.3M
$2.2M
Free Cash Flow
CXM
CXM
NATR
NATR
Q4 25
$19.8M
$7.6M
Q3 25
$34.4M
$16.8M
Q2 25
$83.5M
$3.0M
Q1 25
$4.6M
$1.5M
Q4 24
$8.2M
$10.0M
Q3 24
$19.8M
$7.9M
Q2 24
$39.2M
$-2.0M
Q1 24
$15.2M
$-1.5M
FCF Margin
CXM
CXM
NATR
NATR
Q4 25
9.0%
6.1%
Q3 25
16.2%
13.1%
Q2 25
40.6%
2.6%
Q1 25
2.3%
1.3%
Q4 24
4.1%
8.5%
Q3 24
10.1%
6.9%
Q2 24
20.0%
-1.9%
Q1 24
7.9%
-1.4%
Capex Intensity
CXM
CXM
NATR
NATR
Q4 25
0.1%
1.9%
Q3 25
0.2%
1.3%
Q2 25
0.1%
1.2%
Q1 25
0.4%
1.0%
Q4 24
0.5%
1.9%
Q3 24
0.8%
1.5%
Q2 24
1.3%
3.0%
Q1 24
1.1%
3.3%
Cash Conversion
CXM
CXM
NATR
NATR
Q4 25
6.87×
2.41×
Q3 25
2.76×
3.46×
Q2 25
0.81×
Q1 25
0.05×
0.55×
Q4 24
0.88×
Q3 24
11.58×
2.21×
Q2 24
3.92×
0.97×
Q1 24
0.82×
0.94×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CXM
CXM

License And Service$190.3M87%
Professional Services$28.8M13%

NATR
NATR

Other$68.1M55%
General Health Products$20.2M16%
Digestive Products$13.8M11%
Cardiovascular Products$12.1M10%
Personal Care Products$4.4M4%
Immunity Products$3.1M3%
Weight Management Products$2.1M2%

Related Comparisons