vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) and Sweetgreen, Inc. (SG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sprinklr, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($219.1M vs $161.5M, roughly 1.4× Sweetgreen, Inc.). Sweetgreen, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 77.9% vs 1.3%, a 76.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sprinklr, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.2% vs -2.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Sprinklr, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.2% CAGR vs -6.5%).
Sprinklr is an American software company that develops a software as a service (SaaS) customer experience management (CXM) platform. The company's software, also called Sprinklr, combines different applications for social media marketing, social advertising, content management, collaboration, employee advocacy, customer care, social media research, and social media monitoring.
Sweetgreen is an American fast casual restaurant chain that serves salads. It was founded in November 2006 by Nicolas Jammet, Nathaniel Ru, and Jonathan Neman. In August 2007, they opened their first store in Washington, D.C., three months after they graduated from the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University.
CXM vs SG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $219.1M | $161.5M |
| Net Profit | $2.9M | $125.8M |
| Gross Margin | 66.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 68.7% |
| Net Margin | 1.3% | 77.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.2% | -2.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -72.2% | 602.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $1.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $161.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $219.1M | $155.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.0M | $172.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $205.5M | $185.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.5M | $166.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.7M | $160.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.2M | $173.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.0M | $184.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $125.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | $-49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.6M | $-36.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | $-23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.7M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.5M | $-29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | $-20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6M | $-14.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 66.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 71.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 72.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 73.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | -31.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | -21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.9% | -14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | -17.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | -19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.0% | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | -8.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 77.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | -32.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | -21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.7% | -15.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | -12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | -7.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.05 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.35 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.04 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $189.6M | $156.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $558.1M | $488.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $912.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $156.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $189.6M | $89.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.4M | $130.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.4M | $168.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.3M | $183.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.2M | $214.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.1M | $234.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.8M | $244.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $488.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $558.1M | $356.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $543.4M | $393.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $639.8M | $423.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $612.1M | $432.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $497.0M | $446.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $469.0M | $463.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $610.9M | $470.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $912.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $788.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $824.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $831.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $834.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $970.3M | $856.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $983.8M | $858.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $859.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.0M | $-17.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $19.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.87× | -0.14× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $142.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-17.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.0M | $-8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.8M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.8M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.3M | $14.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.7M | $19.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $-39.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.4M | $-37.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.5M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6M | $-29.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.8M | $-10.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.2M | $-156.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | -25.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.2% | -21.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.6% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | -18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | -12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.0% | -0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.14× | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.87× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.76× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.58× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.92× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CXM
| License And Service | $190.3M | 87% |
| Professional Services | $28.8M | 13% |
SG
Segment breakdown not available.
