vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caesars Entertainment (CZR) and LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC (LSAK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.0B vs $2.9B, roughly 1.0× Caesars Entertainment). LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 0.0% vs -2.9%, a 2.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caesars Entertainment posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs 0.2%). Over the past eight quarters, LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (352.8% CAGR vs 0.7%).
Caesars Entertainment, Inc., formerly Eldorado Resorts, Inc., is an American hotel and casino entertainment company founded and based in Reno, Nevada, that operates more than 50 properties. Eldorado Resorts acquired Caesars Entertainment Corporation and changed its own name to Caesars Entertainment on July 20, 2020.
Lesaka Technologies is a South-African financial technology company that is listed on the NASDAQ and Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Lesaka’s primary focus is on financial inclusion, offering financial services to previously underserved communities and merchants.
CZR vs LSAK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $3.0B |
| Net Profit | $-83.0M | $437.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.4% | 2.2% |
| Net Margin | -2.9% | 0.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.7% | 0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.48 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 26 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $178.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $171.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $168.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $161.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $176.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $153.6M |
| Q3 26 | — | $437.0K | ||
| Q1 26 | $-83.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-250.0M | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-55.0M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-82.0M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-115.0M | $-22.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.0M | $-32.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $-4.5M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 28.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.6% |
| Q3 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 26 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | -16.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | -0.0% |
| Q3 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 26 | -2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | -2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.1% | -13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | -18.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | -3.0% |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $-0.48 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.22 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.27 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.39 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.54 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.04 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $867.0M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | — |
| Total Assets | — | $11.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 26 | $867.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $887.0M | $69.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $836.0M | $72.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $982.0M | $76.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $884.0M | $71.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $866.0M | $60.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $802.0M | $49.7M |
| Q3 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.9B | $216.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $208.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $200.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.3B | $194.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.3B | $148.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7B | $148.5M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $180.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $170.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $161.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $185.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $193.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | $184.2M |
| Q3 26 | — | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.6B | $704.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.9B | $652.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.5B | $653.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4B | $649.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.6B | $640.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.0B | $551.9M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.40× | 1.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.15× | 1.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.15× | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.04× | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.96× | 0.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.04× | 0.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CZR
| Casino | $1.7B | 58% |
| Hotel | $487.0M | 17% |
| Food and beverage | $424.0M | 15% |
| Other | $293.0M | 10% |
LSAK
Segment breakdown not available.
