vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Danaos Corp (DAC) and DouYu International Holdings Ltd (DOYU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Danaos Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($262.2M vs $147.1M, roughly 1.8× DouYu International Holdings Ltd).
Danaos Corporation is a leading global containership ownership and management firm. It operates a large fleet of modern container vessels, providing long-term charter services to top international container liner operators across major global trade routes, supporting the efficiency and reliability of global supply chains.
DouYu International Holdings Ltd operates a leading live streaming platform centered on video game and esports content primarily in mainland China. It offers interactive live streams covering professional esports tournaments, casual gaming content, and variety entertainment, targeting young gaming enthusiasts as its core user base, with main revenue streams including virtual gifting, advertising, and paid memberships.
DAC vs DOYU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $262.2M | $147.1M |
| Net Profit | $130.9M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 13.5% |
| Operating Margin | 47.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 49.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 6.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.12 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | $147.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $130.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $246.3M | $142.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $144.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | $241.5M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $250.9M | — |
| Q2 25 | $130.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.2M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-12.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | $147.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $8.2M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | 47.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.8% | -11.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -16.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | 61.1% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 62.5% | — |
| Q2 25 | 49.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.3% | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 23 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 3.3% | — |
| Q2 25 | $7.12 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.23 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $7.32 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $0.40 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $654.1M | $214.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $279.9M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $448.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $654.1M | $214.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $35.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $471.7M | $558.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $70.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | $367.9M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $319.6M | — |
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $279.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $37.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $895.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $126.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $2.4B | — |
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $448.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $60.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $156.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $3.7B | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
