vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Danaos Corp (DAC) and ECARX Holdings Inc. (ECX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ECARX Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($323.3M vs $262.2M, roughly 1.2× Danaos Corp). Danaos Corp runs the higher net margin — 49.9% vs -21.4%, a 71.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ECARX Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.5% vs 6.4%).
Danaos Corporation is a leading global containership ownership and management firm. It operates a large fleet of modern container vessels, providing long-term charter services to top international container liner operators across major global trade routes, supporting the efficiency and reliability of global supply chains.
ECARX Holdings Inc. is a global mobility technology provider specializing in integrated smart vehicle solutions, including in-vehicle infotainment systems, advanced driver assistance technologies, and connected car cloud services. It primarily partners with automotive manufacturers across the world, with a strong operational presence in the Chinese and European markets.
DAC vs ECX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $262.2M | $323.3M |
| Net Profit | $130.9M | $-69.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 15.5% |
| Operating Margin | 47.9% | -20.2% |
| Net Margin | 49.9% | -21.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.4% | 6.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.3% | 12.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.12 | $-0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | $323.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $246.3M | $303.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | $241.5M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $250.9M | — |
| Q2 25 | $130.9M | $-69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.2M | $-79.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | $147.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $8.2M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | 47.9% | -20.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.8% | -22.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | 61.1% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 62.5% | — |
| Q2 25 | 49.9% | -21.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.3% | -26.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 3.3% | — |
| Q2 25 | $7.12 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.23 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q2 23 | $7.32 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $0.40 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $654.1M | $86.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $-293.7M |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $494.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $654.1M | $86.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $471.7M | $108.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | $367.9M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $319.6M | — |
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $-293.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $-198.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $2.4B | — |
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $494.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $555.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $3.7B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-82.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-86.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -26.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $-82.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-57.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $-86.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-64.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | -26.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -21.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.