vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Danaos Corp (DAC) and FULTON FINANCIAL CORP (FULT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FULTON FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.2M vs $262.2M, roughly 1.3× Danaos Corp). Danaos Corp runs the higher net margin — 49.9% vs 28.2%, a 21.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Danaos Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.4% vs 4.2%).
Danaos Corporation is a leading global containership ownership and management firm. It operates a large fleet of modern container vessels, providing long-term charter services to top international container liner operators across major global trade routes, supporting the efficiency and reliability of global supply chains.
Fulton Financial Corporation is an American regional financial services holding company, headquartered in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
DAC vs FULT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $262.2M | $336.2M |
| Net Profit | $130.9M | $94.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 47.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 49.9% | 28.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.4% | 4.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.3% | 1.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.12 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $336.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $336.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $334.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | $324.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $318.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $319.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $317.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $246.3M | $334.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $94.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $99.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $100.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.9M | $99.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $93.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $68.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $63.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.2M | $95.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 38.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.9% | 37.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.8% | 30.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.9% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.3% | 28.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.12 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.23 | $0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $654.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $32.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $654.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $471.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $32.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $32.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $32.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $32.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $32.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $31.8B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
