vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Danaos Corp (DAC) and HECLA MINING CO (HL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HECLA MINING CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($448.1M vs $262.2M, roughly 1.7× Danaos Corp). Danaos Corp runs the higher net margin — 49.9% vs 30.0%, a 19.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HECLA MINING CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (79.5% vs 6.4%).
Danaos Corporation is a leading global containership ownership and management firm. It operates a large fleet of modern container vessels, providing long-term charter services to top international container liner operators across major global trade routes, supporting the efficiency and reliability of global supply chains.
Hecla Mining is a leading U.S.-based precious and base metals mining firm. Core products include silver, gold, lead and zinc, with operating assets across North America. It supplies raw materials to global jewelry manufacturing, industrial production, and renewable energy segments, and is a top domestic primary silver producer.
DAC vs HL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $262.2M | $448.1M |
| Net Profit | $130.9M | $134.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.4% |
| Operating Margin | 47.9% | 49.1% |
| Net Margin | 49.9% | 30.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.4% | 79.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.3% | 1027.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.12 | $0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $448.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $409.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | $304.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $261.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $249.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $245.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $246.3M | $245.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $189.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $134.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $100.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.9M | $57.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.2M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-5.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.9% | 30.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.8% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.9% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.3% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.12 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.23 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $654.1M | $301.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $3.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $301.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $654.1M | $296.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $471.7M | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $80.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $217.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $134.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 30.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 18.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.61× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $310.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $217.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $148.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $161.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $35.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $78.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $134.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $90.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $103.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-18.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-690.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $28.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-30.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -16.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 31.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.82× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DAC
Segment breakdown not available.
HL
| Silver Contracts | $258.5M | 58% |
| Gold | $129.2M | 29% |
| Zinc | $30.3M | 7% |
| Lead | $23.3M | 5% |
| Environmental Remediation Services | $9.2M | 2% |
