vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Danaos Corp (DAC) and Kyivstar Group Ltd. (KYIV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kyivstar Group Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.0M vs $262.2M, roughly 1.2× Danaos Corp). Danaos Corp runs the higher net margin — 49.9% vs 28.0%, a 21.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Danaos Corporation is a leading global containership ownership and management firm. It operates a large fleet of modern container vessels, providing long-term charter services to top international container liner operators across major global trade routes, supporting the efficiency and reliability of global supply chains.
Kyivstar is a Ukrainian telecommunications operator offering fixed and mobile voice and data services, including 4G LTE, throughout Ukraine. The Kyivstar mobile network covers all cities of Ukraine, as well as more than 28,000 rural settlements, all major national and regional routes, most sea, and river coasts. As of 2024, Kyivstar served approximately 24 million mobile subscribers and over 1 million fixed-broadband customers. In 2024, Kyivstar partnered with Starlink to offer satellite-base...
DAC vs KYIV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $262.2M | $321.0M |
| Net Profit | $130.9M | $90.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 47.9% | 35.5% |
| Net Margin | 49.9% | 28.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.12 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $321.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $297.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $246.3M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $241.5M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $250.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $90.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-89.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.2M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $147.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $8.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.8% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 61.1% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 62.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -30.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.3% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 3.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.12 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.23 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $7.32 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $0.40 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $654.1M | $455.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $455.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $472.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $654.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $471.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $367.9M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $319.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $2.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $3.7B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $558.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $311.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 96.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 76.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.20× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $558.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $406.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $311.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $250.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 96.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 84.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 76.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 52.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
