vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Danaos Corp (DAC) and MGIC INVESTMENT CORP (MTG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MGIC INVESTMENT CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($297.1M vs $262.2M, roughly 1.1× Danaos Corp). MGIC INVESTMENT CORP runs the higher net margin — 55.6% vs 49.9%, a 5.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Danaos Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.4% vs -3.0%).
Danaos Corporation is a leading global containership ownership and management firm. It operates a large fleet of modern container vessels, providing long-term charter services to top international container liner operators across major global trade routes, supporting the efficiency and reliability of global supply chains.
MGIC Investment Corporation NYSE: MTG ("MGIC") is a provider of private mortgage insurance in the United States. The company is headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
DAC vs MTG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $262.2M | $297.1M |
| Net Profit | $130.9M | $165.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 47.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 49.9% | 55.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.4% | -3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.3% | -10.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.12 | $0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $297.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $298.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $304.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $262.2M | $304.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $306.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $301.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $306.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $246.3M | $305.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $165.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $169.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $191.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.9M | $192.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $185.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $184.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $200.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.2M | $204.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 71.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.9% | 80.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 77.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 82.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.8% | 85.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 55.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 56.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 62.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.9% | 63.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 61.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 65.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.3% | 66.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.12 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.75 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.23 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $654.1M | $235.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $5.0B |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $6.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $235.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $369.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $266.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $654.1M | $294.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $207.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $229.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $288.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $471.7M | $281.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $5.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $6.5B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
