vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DoorDash (DASH) and Freeport-McMoRan (FCX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Freeport-McMoRan is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.3B vs $4.0B, roughly 1.3× DoorDash). Freeport-McMoRan runs the higher net margin — 10.7% vs 5.4%, a 5.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DoorDash posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.7% vs -10.4%). DoorDash produced more free cash flow last quarter ($367.0M vs $-312.0M). Over the past eight quarters, DoorDash's revenue compounded faster (25.5% CAGR vs -7.9%).
DoorDash, Inc. is an American company operating online food ordering and food delivery. It trades under the symbol DASH. With a 56% market share, DoorDash is the largest food delivery platform in the United States. It also has a 60% market share in the convenience delivery category. As of December 31, 2020, the platform was used by 450,000 merchants, 20 million consumers, and had over one million delivery couriers.
Freeport-McMoRan Inc., often called Freeport, is an American mining company based in the Freeport-McMoRan Center, in Phoenix, Arizona. The company is the world's largest producer of molybdenum, a major copper producer and operates the world's largest gold mine, the Grasberg mine in Papua, Indonesia.
DASH vs FCX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.0B | $5.3B |
| Net Profit | $213.0M | $565.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.7% | 15.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.4% | 10.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 37.7% | -10.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 51.1% | -21.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.49 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $6.2B |
| Q4 25 | $213.0M | $565.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $244.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $285.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $193.0M | $793.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $141.0M | $721.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-157.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-23.0M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 32.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 29.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.6% | 32.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.4% | 26.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 12.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.0% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.9% | 18.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.49 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.55 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.65 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.44 | $0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.38 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.38 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.06 | $0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.4B | $3.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.0B | $18.9B |
| Total Assets | $19.7B | $58.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.50× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1B | $5.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.4B |
| Q4 25 | $10.0B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5B | $18.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.9B | $18.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.4B | $17.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $17.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6B | $17.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $17.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0B | $17.0B |
| Q4 25 | $19.7B | $58.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.0B | $56.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.9B | $56.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.6B | $56.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.8B | $54.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.3B | $55.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8B | $54.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4B | $54.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.55× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.56× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $421.0M | $693.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $367.0M | $-312.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.3% | -5.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 19.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.98× | 1.23× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.2B | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $421.0M | $693.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $871.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $504.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $635.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $518.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $531.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $530.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $553.0M | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | $367.0M | $-312.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $808.0M | $608.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $438.0M | $934.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.0M | $-114.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $486.0M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $499.0M | $673.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $507.0M | $840.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $536.0M | $642.0M |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.3% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.5% | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.3% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.3% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 21.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 20.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.98× | 1.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.57× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.77× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.29× | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.67× | 1.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.28× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DASH
Segment breakdown not available.
FCX
| Morenci | $2.5B | 47% |
| Grasberg Segment | $964.0M | 18% |
| Copper In Concentrates | $934.0M | 18% |
| Molybdenum | $541.0M | 10% |
| Gold | $388.0M | 7% |
