vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dayforce (DAY) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $481.6M, roughly 1.2× Dayforce). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -40.9%, a 70.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dayforce posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.5% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Dayforce's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs 5.6%).
Dayforce, Inc., formerly Ceridian, is an American human resources software and services company.
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
DAY vs KIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $481.6M | $558.0M |
| Net Profit | $-196.8M | $166.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | 37.2% |
| Net Margin | -40.9% | 29.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.5% | 4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9940.0% | 23.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.23 | $0.46 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $542.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $481.6M | $535.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $464.7M | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $481.8M | $536.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $465.2M | $525.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $440.0M | $507.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.3M | $500.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $166.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $151.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-196.8M | $137.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $163.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | $132.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.8M | $166.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $136.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | $119.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 47.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 36.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 32.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -40.9% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 23.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.23 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $627.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $631.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $10.4B |
| Total Assets | $8.7B | $19.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.23× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $211.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $627.6M | $159.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $625.2M | $226.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $557.3M | $131.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $579.7M | $688.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $494.1M | $789.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $465.4M | $126.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $631.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $631.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $632.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $10.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $10.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $10.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $10.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $19.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $19.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.7B | $19.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5B | $19.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5B | $19.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1B | $20.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1B | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $19.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.47× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.49× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $31.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.2M | $332.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $112.7M | $305.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.6M | $223.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.0M | $239.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.8M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.2M | $294.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $205.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.29× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.33× | 1.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.50× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.90× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DAY
| Dayforce Recurring | $333.0M | 69% |
| Cloud And Bureau Professional Services And Other | $78.5M | 16% |
| Float | $42.2M | 9% |
| Powerpay Recurring | $19.7M | 4% |
| Other Recurring | $8.2M | 2% |
KIM
| Revenues from rental properties, net | $552.8M | 99% |
| Management and other fee income | $5.2M | 1% |
