vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Digital Brands Group, Inc. (DBGI) and Ivanhoe Electric Inc. (IE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Digital Brands Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6M vs $896.0K, roughly 1.8× Ivanhoe Electric Inc.). Digital Brands Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1283.8% vs -4500.4%, a 3216.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Digital Brands Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-25.1% vs -32.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Ivanhoe Electric Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (57.8% CAGR vs -33.0%).
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is an American manufacturer of home and security products, headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois. Its portfolio of businesses and brands includes Moen and the House of Rohl; outdoor living and security products from Therma-Tru, Larson, Fiberon, Master Lock and SentrySafe; and MasterBrand Cabinets. Fortune Brands is a Fortune 500 company and part of the S&P 400 Index. As of December 31, 2021, the company reported employing approximately 28,000 associates and pos...
Ivanhoe Electric Inc. is a critical minerals exploration and development firm focused on metals for global electrification. It targets high-grade copper, gold, silver and strategic deposits, with primary North American operations, supplying raw materials to renewable energy, EV and power grid infrastructure supply chains worldwide.
DBGI vs IE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6M | $896.0K |
| Net Profit | $-20.6M | $-40.3M |
| Gross Margin | -77.1% | 69.5% |
| Operating Margin | -1385.4% | -4167.7% |
| Net Margin | -1283.8% | -4500.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -25.1% | -32.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -283.4% | -318.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.73 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | $896.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $545.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $735.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $671.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $538.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $360.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-20.6M | $-40.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | $-17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | $-23.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $-34.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.4M | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5M | $-43.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.5M | $-46.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-683.7K | $-60.1M |
| Q4 25 | -77.1% | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.7% | 51.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.6% | 72.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.6% | 60.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -35.3% | 64.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | 61.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.9% | 64.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.1% | 72.2% |
| Q4 25 | -1385.4% | -4167.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -201.3% | -4328.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -88.2% | -2400.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -106.7% | -3674.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -230.1% | -2229.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -112.4% | -6233.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.8% | -9023.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.3% | -15800.3% |
| Q4 25 | -1283.8% | -4500.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -208.7% | -3214.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -94.1% | -2233.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -111.7% | -4645.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -250.7% | 1386.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -145.1% | -6443.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -103.4% | -8695.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.1% | -16693.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.73 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.18 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.81 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.92 | $0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.02 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-81.53 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-104.18 | $0.39 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-23.02 | $0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9M | $173.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.8M | $416.1M |
| Total Assets | $44.5M | $483.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.70× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | $173.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $542.6K | $88.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $98.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.4K | $41.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.3K | $81.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8K | $133.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3K | $179.4M |
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.8M | $416.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.0M | $280.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $293.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2M | $307.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $268.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0K | $250.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $289.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0M | $331.5M |
| Q4 25 | $44.5M | $483.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.2M | $386.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $400.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $414.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9M | $374.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.3M | $375.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | $416.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.8M | $461.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.7M | $-25.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-25.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -2872.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-90.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.7M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | $-27.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.5M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.8M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-541.6K | $-36.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-44.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | $-50.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-25.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-27.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-21.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-15.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-541.6K | $-36.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-45.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.3M | $-50.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -2872.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5103.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1990.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2146.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2432.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.2% | -5506.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -47.9% | -8372.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.1% | -14064.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 117.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 127.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 93.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 186.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.