vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Digital Brands Group, Inc. (DBGI) and mF International Ltd (MFI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
mF International Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9M vs $1.6M, roughly 1.2× Digital Brands Group, Inc.). mF International Ltd runs the higher net margin — -90.9% vs -1283.8%, a 1192.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, mF International Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs -25.1%).
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is an American manufacturer of home and security products, headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois. Its portfolio of businesses and brands includes Moen and the House of Rohl; outdoor living and security products from Therma-Tru, Larson, Fiberon, Master Lock and SentrySafe; and MasterBrand Cabinets. Fortune Brands is a Fortune 500 company and part of the S&P 400 Index. As of December 31, 2021, the company reported employing approximately 28,000 associates and pos...
MF Global Holdings Ltd., formerly known as Man Financial, was a major global financial derivatives broker, or commodities brokerage firm that went bankrupt in 2011. MF Global provided exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures and options as well as over-the-counter products such as contracts for difference (CFDs), foreign exchange and spread betting. MF Global Inc., its broker-dealer subsidiary, was a primary dealer in United States Treasury securities. A series of perceived liquidity prob...
DBGI vs MFI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6M | $1.9M |
| Net Profit | $-20.6M | $-1.7M |
| Gross Margin | -77.1% | 35.5% |
| Operating Margin | -1385.4% | -93.4% |
| Net Margin | -1283.8% | -90.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -25.1% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -283.4% | -145.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.73 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-20.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.5M | $-710.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-683.7K | — |
| Q4 25 | -77.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.6% | 35.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -35.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.9% | 42.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -1385.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -201.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -88.2% | -93.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -106.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -230.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -112.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.8% | -50.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -1283.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -208.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -94.1% | -90.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -111.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -250.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -145.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -103.4% | -44.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.73 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.18 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.81 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.92 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.02 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-81.53 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-104.18 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-23.02 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9M | $1.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.1M | $518.6K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.8M | $2.8M |
| Total Assets | $44.5M | $5.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.70× | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $542.6K | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.4K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.3K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8K | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3K | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $518.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $6.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $44.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.7M | $-335.3K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-339.2K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -17.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | $-335.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-541.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-339.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-541.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -17.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -47.9% | -142.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
