vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Digital Brands Group, Inc. (DBGI) and TMC the metals Co Inc. (TMC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Digital Brands Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6M vs $1.3M, roughly 1.2× TMC the metals Co Inc.). Digital Brands Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1283.8% vs -3136.5%, a 1852.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TMC the metals Co Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2425.5% vs -25.1%). Over the past eight quarters, TMC the metals Co Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (159.0% CAGR vs -33.0%).
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is an American manufacturer of home and security products, headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois. Its portfolio of businesses and brands includes Moen and the House of Rohl; outdoor living and security products from Therma-Tru, Larson, Fiberon, Master Lock and SentrySafe; and MasterBrand Cabinets. Fortune Brands is a Fortune 500 company and part of the S&P 400 Index. As of December 31, 2021, the company reported employing approximately 28,000 associates and pos...
The Metals Company, formerly DeepGreen Metals, is a Canadian deep sea mining exploration company. The company focuses on the mining of polymetallic nodules in the Clarion Clipperton Zone of the Pacific.
DBGI vs TMC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6M | $1.3M |
| Net Profit | $-20.6M | $-40.4M |
| Gross Margin | -77.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -1385.4% | -3470.9% |
| Net Margin | -1283.8% | -3136.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -25.1% | 2425.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -283.4% | -151.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.73 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-20.6M | $-40.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | $-184.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-683.7K | — |
| Q4 25 | -77.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -35.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -1385.4% | -3470.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -201.3% | -4134.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -88.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -106.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -230.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -112.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -1283.8% | -3136.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -208.7% | -13780.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -94.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -111.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -250.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -145.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -103.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.73 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.18 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.81 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.92 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.02 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-81.53 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-104.18 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-23.02 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9M | $117.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.8M | $-33.4M |
| Total Assets | $44.5M | $181.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.70× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | $117.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $542.6K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.4K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.3K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.8K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3K | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.8M | $-33.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.0M | $-40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $44.5M | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.2M | $175.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.7M | $-11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-11.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -889.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.7M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-541.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-541.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -889.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -859.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -47.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
