vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. (DDI) and LandBridge Co LLC (LB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($83.0M vs $56.8M, roughly 1.5× LandBridge Co LLC). DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 30.2% vs 14.2%, a 16.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LandBridge Co LLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (55.6% vs 13.7%). LandBridge Co LLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($122.0M vs $31.6M).
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
DDI vs LB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $83.0M | $56.8M |
| Net Profit | $25.0M | $8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 70.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 42.5% | 60.0% |
| Net Margin | 30.2% | 14.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.7% | 55.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.0% | -83.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $10.11 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $56.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $50.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $36.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.0M | $28.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.2M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $88.1M | $19.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $-57.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.3M | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 68.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 57.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.0% | -197.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.2% | 71.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 135.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | -222.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.4% | 56.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.11 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.39 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.23 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $372.7M | $30.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $37.9M | $570.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.5M | $340.3M |
| Total Assets | $879.8M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.05× | 1.68× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $372.7M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $339.2M | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $309.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $570.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $366.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $370.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $375.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $385.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.9M | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.0M | $360.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $340.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $272.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $266.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $217.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $211.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $815.5M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $786.2M | $296.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $755.2M | $162.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $879.8M | $689.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $852.6M | $710.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $831.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | 2.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.05× | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.05× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $31.8M | $126.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.6M | $122.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 38.0% | 214.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 7.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.27× | 15.68× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $129.5M | $207.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $126.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $67.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.8M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.4M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.9M | $17.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $122.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $66.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.4M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.9M | $17.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 214.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 66.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 75.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 182.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.0% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.0% | 60.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.6% | 90.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.27× | 2.80× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.15× | 1.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
