vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Deckers Brands (DECK) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Deckers Brands is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.8× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). Deckers Brands runs the higher net margin — 24.6% vs 5.0%, a 19.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Deckers Brands posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.1% vs -2.5%). Deckers Brands produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $66.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Deckers Brands's revenue compounded faster (42.8% CAGR vs 6.6%).

Deckers Outdoor Corporation, doing business as Deckers Brands, is an American footwear designer and distributor founded in 1973 and based in Goleta, California. The company's portfolio of brands includes UGG, Teva, and Hoka. It was founded by Doug Otto and Karl F. Lopker.

Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.

DECK vs GTLS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
DECK
DECK
1.8× larger
DECK
$2.0B
$1.1B
GTLS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
DECK
DECK
+9.6% gap
DECK
7.1%
-2.5%
GTLS
Higher net margin
DECK
DECK
19.6% more per $
DECK
24.6%
5.0%
GTLS
More free cash flow
DECK
DECK
$954.1M more FCF
DECK
$1.0B
$66.2M
GTLS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
DECK
DECK
Annualised
DECK
42.8%
6.6%
GTLS

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
DECK
DECK
GTLS
GTLS
Revenue
$2.0B
$1.1B
Net Profit
$481.1M
$53.6M
Gross Margin
59.8%
33.3%
Operating Margin
31.4%
11.6%
Net Margin
24.6%
5.0%
Revenue YoY
7.1%
-2.5%
Net Profit YoY
5.3%
-32.7%
EPS (diluted)
$3.33
$1.06

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
DECK
DECK
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
$2.0B
$1.1B
Q3 25
$1.4B
$1.1B
Q2 25
$964.5M
$1.1B
Q1 25
$1.0B
$1.0B
Q4 24
$1.8B
$1.1B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$1.1B
Q2 24
$825.3M
$1.0B
Q1 24
$959.8M
$950.7M
Net Profit
DECK
DECK
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
$481.1M
$53.6M
Q3 25
$268.2M
$-138.5M
Q2 25
$139.2M
$76.1M
Q1 25
$151.4M
$49.5M
Q4 24
$456.7M
$79.6M
Q3 24
$242.3M
$69.0M
Q2 24
$115.6M
$58.6M
Q1 24
$127.5M
$11.3M
Gross Margin
DECK
DECK
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
59.8%
33.3%
Q3 25
56.2%
34.1%
Q2 25
55.8%
33.6%
Q1 25
56.7%
33.9%
Q4 24
60.3%
33.6%
Q3 24
55.9%
34.1%
Q2 24
56.9%
33.8%
Q1 24
56.2%
31.8%
Operating Margin
DECK
DECK
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
31.4%
11.6%
Q3 25
22.8%
-8.0%
Q2 25
17.1%
15.7%
Q1 25
17.0%
15.2%
Q4 24
31.0%
17.0%
Q3 24
23.3%
16.8%
Q2 24
16.1%
16.1%
Q1 24
15.0%
11.9%
Net Margin
DECK
DECK
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
24.6%
5.0%
Q3 25
18.7%
-12.6%
Q2 25
14.4%
7.0%
Q1 25
14.8%
4.9%
Q4 24
25.0%
7.2%
Q3 24
18.5%
6.5%
Q2 24
14.0%
5.6%
Q1 24
13.3%
1.2%
EPS (diluted)
DECK
DECK
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
$3.33
$1.06
Q3 25
$1.82
$-3.23
Q2 25
$0.93
$1.53
Q1 25
$-2.78
$0.94
Q4 24
$3.00
$1.57
Q3 24
$1.59
$1.33
Q2 24
$4.52
$1.10
Q1 24
$4.82
$0.10

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
DECK
DECK
GTLS
GTLS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$2.1B
$366.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.6B
$3.2B
Total Assets
$4.1B
$9.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.13×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
DECK
DECK
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
$2.1B
$366.0M
Q3 25
$1.4B
$399.2M
Q2 25
$1.7B
$342.3M
Q1 25
$1.9B
$296.2M
Q4 24
$2.2B
$308.6M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$310.2M
Q2 24
$1.4B
$247.4M
Q1 24
$1.5B
$191.9M
Total Debt
DECK
DECK
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
$3.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$3.8B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
DECK
DECK
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
$2.6B
$3.2B
Q3 25
$2.5B
$3.2B
Q2 25
$2.5B
$3.4B
Q1 25
$2.5B
$3.0B
Q4 24
$2.6B
$2.8B
Q3 24
$2.2B
$3.0B
Q2 24
$2.1B
$2.7B
Q1 24
$2.1B
$2.7B
Total Assets
DECK
DECK
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
$4.1B
$9.8B
Q3 25
$3.8B
$9.8B
Q2 25
$3.8B
$9.7B
Q1 25
$3.6B
$9.3B
Q4 24
$4.0B
$9.1B
Q3 24
$3.4B
$9.5B
Q2 24
$3.3B
$9.3B
Q1 24
$3.1B
$9.2B
Debt / Equity
DECK
DECK
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
1.13×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
1.33×
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
DECK
DECK
GTLS
GTLS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.0B
$88.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$1.0B
$66.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
52.1%
6.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.1%
2.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.17×
1.66×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$929.1M
$202.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
DECK
DECK
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
$1.0B
$88.8M
Q3 25
$8.1M
$118.0M
Q2 25
$36.1M
$145.9M
Q1 25
$-73.0M
$-60.0M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$281.4M
Q3 24
$-90.5M
$200.6M
Q2 24
$112.7M
$116.1M
Q1 24
$-28.7M
$-95.1M
Free Cash Flow
DECK
DECK
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
$1.0B
$66.2M
Q3 25
$-13.9M
$94.7M
Q2 25
$12.2M
$122.0M
Q1 25
$-89.4M
$-80.1M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$260.9M
Q3 24
$-113.4M
$174.5M
Q2 24
$90.1M
$88.0M
Q1 24
$-44.0M
$-141.2M
FCF Margin
DECK
DECK
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
52.1%
6.1%
Q3 25
-1.0%
8.6%
Q2 25
1.3%
11.3%
Q1 25
-8.8%
-8.0%
Q4 24
58.6%
23.6%
Q3 24
-8.6%
16.4%
Q2 24
10.9%
8.5%
Q1 24
-4.6%
-14.9%
Capex Intensity
DECK
DECK
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
1.1%
2.1%
Q3 25
1.5%
2.1%
Q2 25
2.5%
2.2%
Q1 25
1.6%
2.0%
Q4 24
1.3%
1.9%
Q3 24
1.7%
2.5%
Q2 24
2.7%
2.7%
Q1 24
1.6%
4.8%
Cash Conversion
DECK
DECK
GTLS
GTLS
Q4 25
2.17×
1.66×
Q3 25
0.03×
Q2 25
0.26×
1.92×
Q1 25
-0.48×
-1.21×
Q4 24
2.40×
3.54×
Q3 24
-0.37×
2.91×
Q2 24
0.97×
1.98×
Q1 24
-0.22×
-8.42×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

DECK
DECK

UGG Brand Segment$1.3B67%
Hoka Brand Segment$628.9M32%
Other Brands Segment$23.2M1%

GTLS
GTLS

Repair Service And Leasing Segment$330.4M31%
Heat Transfer Systems Segment$325.8M30%
Specialty Products Segment$259.5M24%
Transferred Over Time$94.4M9%
Transferred At Point In Time$69.5M6%

Related Comparisons