vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dream Finders Homes, Inc. (DFH) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.7× Dream Finders Homes, Inc.). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 4.8%, a 10.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs -22.3%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $136.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Dream Finders Homes, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (21.0% CAGR vs 10.5%).
Dream Finders Homes, Inc. is a U.S. homebuilding firm that constructs and sells entry-level to luxury residential properties, including single-family homes and townhomes, across high-growth domestic markets. It also provides mortgage, title insurance and home warranty services for homebuyers.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
DFH vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $58.8M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 4.8% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -22.3% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -54.9% | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.57 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $969.8M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $989.9M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $58.8M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.0M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.6M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $54.9M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.5M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.7M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.8% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.2% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.0% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.7% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.57 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.47 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.56 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.28 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.70 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.81 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $234.8M | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.6B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $3.7B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.13× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $234.8M | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $251.0M | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $210.3M | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $297.5M | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $274.4M | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $204.9M | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.8M | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.13× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.03× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $143.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $136.0M | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.2% | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.44× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-126.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $143.6M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-131.0M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-68.5M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-44.7M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $306.5M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-205.0M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-110.6M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $136.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-135.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-78.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-47.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $302.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-222.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-112.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.44× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.79× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.21× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.81× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.35× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.90× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.37× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DFH
| Midwest Segment | $454.2M | 37% |
| Southeast Segment | $397.5M | 33% |
| Mid Atlantic Segment | $307.3M | 25% |
| Financial Services Segment | $53.7M | 4% |
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
