vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (DFLI) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $13.1M, roughly 1.0× Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp.). Laird Superfood, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -13.2% vs -344.9%, a 331.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs 6.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 2.2%).
Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. is a U.S.-based energy technology company specializing in designing and manufacturing high-performance, sustainable lithium-ion batteries. Its core offerings include deep-cycle batteries for RVs, marine uses, off-grid power systems, and residential energy storage, primarily serving consumer and small industrial renewable energy markets across North America.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
DFLI vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.1M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $-45.0M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 18.2% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | -78.1% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | -344.9% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.9% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -357.6% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-13.09 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.1M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.0M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.2M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.4M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.2M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.5M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-45.0M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.1M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.0M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.8M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.8M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.6M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-10.4M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 18.2% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.7% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.3% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.0% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.4% | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | -78.1% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.7% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.2% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.3% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -58.5% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -47.4% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -51.1% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -46.7% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | -344.9% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -69.3% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -43.3% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -50.9% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.6% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -53.3% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -103.2% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -82.9% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-13.09 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.93 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.60 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.22 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.17 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $18.3M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $19.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $86.5M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.68× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.3M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.0M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.5M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $19.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $97.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $89.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.6M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.6M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.6M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.4M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-297.0K | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.8M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $86.5M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.8M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.8M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.2M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.9M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.0M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $88.4M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.27× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.33× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-14.7M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-14.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -113.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-14.7M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.5M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | $-14.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | -113.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -33.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.5% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DFLI
| Original Equipment Manufacturers | $8.1M | 62% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $4.7M | 36% |
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
