vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC (DGII) and Empire State Realty OP, L.P. (ESBA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Empire State Realty OP, L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($199.2M vs $122.5M, roughly 1.6× DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC). Empire State Realty OP, L.P. runs the higher net margin — 16.1% vs 9.6%, a 6.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.9% vs 0.8%). Empire State Realty OP, L.P. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($50.6M vs $35.2M). Over the past eight quarters, DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs 4.9%).
Digi International, Inc. is an American Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) technology company based in Hopkins, Minnesota. Founded in 1985, they were best known in the early 1990s as a manufacturer of multi-line serial data serial cards for PC clones, allowing these machines to run multi-line bulletin board systems (BBSes). As this market began to wind down with the rise of the internet in the late 1990s, Digi began to concentrate on network attached devices and industrial monitoring.
Empire State Realty OP, L.P. is a real estate operating partnership focused on owning, managing, and leasing premium commercial and retail properties primarily in the New York City metropolitan area. Its portfolio includes iconic landmarks like the Empire State Building, serving corporate tenants, retail brands and tourism-related business segments.
DGII vs ESBA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $122.5M | $199.2M |
| Net Profit | $11.7M | $32.2M |
| Gross Margin | 62.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.3% | 17.8% |
| Net Margin | 9.6% | 16.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.9% | 0.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 16.1% | 71.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $122.5M | $199.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $114.3M | $197.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.5M | $191.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.5M | $180.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.9M | $197.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $105.1M | $199.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $105.2M | $189.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $107.7M | $181.2M |
| Q4 25 | $11.7M | $32.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $15.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.1M | $18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7M | $28.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | $10.2M |
| Q4 25 | 62.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 57.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.3% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.1% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.2% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | 20.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.6% | 17.1% |
| Q4 25 | 9.6% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 5.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.31 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.27 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.28 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.27 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.26 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.11 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.9M | $132.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $135.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $649.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $918.4M | $4.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.9M | $132.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.9M | $154.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.1M | $94.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $187.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.9M | $385.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.5M | $421.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.3M | $535.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.8M | $333.6M |
| Q4 25 | $135.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $123.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $151.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $649.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $636.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $621.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $605.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $590.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $581.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $563.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $549.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $918.4M | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $922.6M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $770.3M | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $781.0M | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $796.1M | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $815.1M | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $820.4M | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $825.3M | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $35.6M | $249.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $35.2M | $50.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 28.7% | 25.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 99.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.04× | 7.74× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $111.4M | $109.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $35.6M | $249.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $105.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.0M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.7M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $102.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | $37.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.1M | $70.9M |
| Q4 25 | $35.2M | $50.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.5M | $72.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $-55.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.7M | $41.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.1M | $88.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $-65.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.5M | $19.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.5M | $23.2M |
| Q4 25 | 28.7% | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.1% | 36.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.3% | -28.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.6% | 22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.1% | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.3% | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.2% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.6% | 12.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 99.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 42.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 87.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 84.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 26.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.04× | 7.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.81× | 7.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.34× | 2.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.50× | 5.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.95× | 13.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.23× | 4.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.57× | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.27× | 6.94× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DGII
| Io T Productsand Services | $86.4M | 71% |
| Io T Solutions | $36.1M | 29% |
ESBA
| Real Estate Segment | $163.8M | 82% |
| Observatory Segment | $35.2M | 18% |
