vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC (DGII) and Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ranger Energy Services, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($142.2M vs $122.5M, roughly 1.2× DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC). DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC runs the higher net margin — 9.6% vs 2.3%, a 7.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.9% vs -0.6%). DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($35.2M vs $17.1M). Over the past eight quarters, DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs 1.9%).
Digi International, Inc. is an American Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) technology company based in Hopkins, Minnesota. Founded in 1985, they were best known in the early 1990s as a manufacturer of multi-line serial data serial cards for PC clones, allowing these machines to run multi-line bulletin board systems (BBSes). As this market began to wind down with the rise of the internet in the late 1990s, Digi began to concentrate on network attached devices and industrial monitoring.
Ranger Energy Services, Inc. is a leading North American onshore oilfield services provider. It offers a full suite of well completion, workover, rig operations, and production enhancement solutions for upstream oil and gas operators, primarily serving active unconventional shale and tight resource basins across the continental United States.
DGII vs RNGR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $122.5M | $142.2M |
| Net Profit | $11.7M | $3.2M |
| Gross Margin | 62.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.3% | 2.3% |
| Net Margin | 9.6% | 2.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.9% | -0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 16.1% | -44.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $122.5M | $142.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $114.3M | $128.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.5M | $140.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.5M | $135.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.9M | $143.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $105.1M | $153.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $105.2M | $138.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $107.7M | $136.9M |
| Q4 25 | $11.7M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $600.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.1M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9M | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | $-800.0K |
| Q4 25 | 62.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 57.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.6% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 9.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | -0.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.31 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.27 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.28 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.27 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.26 | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.11 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.9M | $10.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $135.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $649.2M | $300.1M |
| Total Assets | $918.4M | $419.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.9M | $10.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.9M | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.1M | $48.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.9M | $40.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.5M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.3M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.8M | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | $135.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.0M | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $123.2M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $151.6M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.8M | $0 |
| Q4 25 | $649.2M | $300.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $636.1M | $270.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $621.5M | $276.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $605.2M | $272.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $590.7M | $273.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $581.0M | $267.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $563.1M | $260.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $549.6M | $261.7M |
| Q4 25 | $918.4M | $419.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $922.6M | $372.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $770.3M | $381.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $781.0M | $376.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $796.1M | $381.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $815.1M | $373.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $820.4M | $359.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $825.3M | $355.5M |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.16× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.21× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.27× | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | 0.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $35.6M | $24.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $35.2M | $17.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 28.7% | 12.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.04× | 7.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $111.4M | $42.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $35.6M | $24.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.0M | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $10.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.7M | $32.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | $22.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.1M | $12.0M |
| Q4 25 | $35.2M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.5M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.7M | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.1M | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.5M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.5M | $5.5M |
| Q4 25 | 28.7% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.1% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.1% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.3% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.6% | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 4.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.04× | 7.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.81× | 11.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.34× | 2.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.50× | 17.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.95× | 5.64× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.23× | 2.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.57× | 4.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.27× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DGII
| Io T Productsand Services | $86.4M | 71% |
| Io T Solutions | $36.1M | 29% |
RNGR
| High Specification Rigs | $92.3M | 65% |
| Processing Solutions And Ancillary Services | $37.5M | 26% |
| Wireline Services | $12.4M | 9% |
