vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST (DHC) and Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hillenbrand, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($550.2M vs $379.6M, roughly 1.4× DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST). Hillenbrand, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -0.4% vs -5.6%, a 5.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.0% vs -22.2%). Hillenbrand, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-31.6M vs $-166.4M). Over the past eight quarters, DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST's revenue compounded faster (1.2% CAGR vs -16.3%).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
Hillenbrand, Inc. is a global diversified industrial firm that designs, manufactures, and distributes specialized processing equipment and durable industrial solutions. It serves food & beverage, agriculture, manufacturing, waste management sectors, with operations across North America, Europe, and APAC.
DHC vs HI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $379.6M | $550.2M |
| Net Profit | $-21.2M | $-2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.4% |
| Operating Margin | -12.6% | -2.2% |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | -0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.0% | -22.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 75.7% | -134.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $379.6M | $550.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.7M | $652.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $382.7M | $598.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $386.9M | $715.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.6M | $706.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.6M | $837.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $371.4M | $786.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $370.8M | $785.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-21.2M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-164.0M | $75.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-91.6M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.0M | $-40.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-87.4M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-98.7M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-97.9M | $-248.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-86.3M | $6.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.9% |
| Q4 25 | -12.6% | -2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -43.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.0% | -32.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.7% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -42.2% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.3% | -31.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.3% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.68 | $1.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.37 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.41 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.41 | $-3.53 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.36 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $105.4M | $173.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $4.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.47× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $105.4M | $173.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.4M | $164.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.8M | $162.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $302.6M | $458.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.6M | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.5M | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $265.6M | $223.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $207.1M | $224.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $5.6B |
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | 1.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-19.6M | $-27.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-166.4M | $-31.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -43.8% | -5.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 38.7% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-280.3M | $7.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-19.6M | $-27.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-49.3M | $67.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.0M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.2M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.2M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.1M | $166.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.3M | $45.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.6M | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-166.4M | $-31.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-89.8M | $58.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-42.9M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-89.5M | $-21.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.1M | $153.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $29.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.1M | $-9.6M |
| Q4 25 | -43.8% | -5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.1% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.1% | -1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.6% | -3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.0% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.9% | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 38.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.6% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.52× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DHC
| Senior Housing Operating Portfolio Segment | $323.4M | 85% |
| Rental Income | $56.2M | 15% |
HI
| Transferred At Point In Time | $256.5M | 47% |
| Transferred Over Time | $207.1M | 38% |
| Molding Technology Solutions | $86.6M | 16% |