vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST (DHC) and OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLYMPIC STEEL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($490.7M vs $379.6M, roughly 1.3× DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST). OLYMPIC STEEL INC runs the higher net margin — 0.4% vs -5.6%, a 6.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OLYMPIC STEEL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.4% vs -0.0%). OLYMPIC STEEL INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-12.9M vs $-166.4M). Over the past eight quarters, DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST's revenue compounded faster (1.2% CAGR vs 0.1%).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
DHC vs ZEUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $379.6M | $490.7M |
| Net Profit | $-21.2M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -12.6% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.0% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 75.7% | -21.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $379.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.7M | $490.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $382.7M | $496.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $386.9M | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.6M | $418.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.6M | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $371.4M | $526.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $370.8M | $526.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-21.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-164.0M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-91.6M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.0M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-87.4M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-98.7M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-97.9M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-86.3M | $8.7M |
| Q4 25 | -12.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -43.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.7% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -42.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.3% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.68 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.04 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.37 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.41 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.41 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.36 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $105.4M | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | $240.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $579.1M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.47× | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $105.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.4M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.8M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $302.6M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.6M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.5M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $265.6M | $9.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $207.1M | $10.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $233.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $235.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $272.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $209.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $196.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $579.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $578.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $574.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $573.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $570.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $569.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $563.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-19.6M | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-166.4M | $-12.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -43.8% | -2.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 38.7% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -2.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-280.3M | $41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-19.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-49.3M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.0M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.2M | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.2M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.1M | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.3M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.6M | $-2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-166.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-89.8M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-42.9M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-89.5M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.1M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.1M | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | -43.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.1% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.9% | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 38.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.6% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DHC
| Senior Housing Operating Portfolio Segment | $323.4M | 85% |
| Rental Income | $56.2M | 15% |
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |
