vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Danaher Corporation (DHR) and PBF Energy Inc. (PBF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PBF Energy Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.9B vs $6.0B, roughly 1.3× Danaher Corporation). Danaher Corporation runs the higher net margin — 17.3% vs 2.5%, a 14.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PBF Energy Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs 3.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Danaher Corporation's revenue compounded faster (1.8% CAGR vs -4.9%).
Danaher CorporationDHREarnings & Financial Report
Danaher Corporation is an American healthcare company headquartered in Washington, D.C.. It develops products used for advances in biotechnology, life sciences, and diagnostics. The company operates three divisions: biotechnology, which develops products for the development of therapeutics; life sciences, which develops products to identify causes of disease, new therapies, and to test and manufacture new drugs, vaccines and gene editing technologies; and diagnostics, which develops instruments,...
PBF Energy Inc. is a petroleum refining and logistics company that produces and sells transportation fuels, heating oils, lubricants, petrochemical feedstocks, and other petroleum products. The company owns and operated 6 refineries throughout the United States, located in Chalmette, Louisiana; Toledo, Ohio; Paulsboro, New Jersey; the Delaware City Refinery in Delaware City; Torrance, California; Martinez, California. PBF produces a range of products including gasoline, ultra-low-sulfur diese...
DHR vs PBF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0B | $7.9B |
| Net Profit | $1.0B | $200.2M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | 3.5% |
| Operating Margin | 22.6% | 3.8% |
| Net Margin | 17.3% | 2.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.7% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.9% | 149.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.45 | $1.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.8B | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1B | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9B | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | $8.7B |
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | $200.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $78.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $908.0M | $170.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $555.0M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $954.0M | $-401.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $-289.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $818.0M | $-285.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $907.0M | $-65.2M |
| Q1 26 | 60.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.0% | -1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.3% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.2% | -5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.5% | -4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.7% | -3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.7% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | 22.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | -7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | -5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | -0.9% |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | -3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.8% | -0.7% |
| Q1 26 | $1.45 | $1.65 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.69 | $0.74 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.27 | $1.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.77 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.32 | $-3.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.50 | $-2.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.12 | $-2.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.22 | $-0.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $541.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $5.7B |
| Total Assets | — | $14.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $541.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $527.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $482.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $590.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $468.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $536.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $976.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $52.5B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.1B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.3B | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.8B | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.5B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.3B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.9B | $6.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $14.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.5B | $13.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.9B | $13.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.6B | $13.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.1B | $13.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.5B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.6B | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.6B | $14.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.3B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 4.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.28× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $366.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $25.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $191.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $-661.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $-329.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $-68.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $425.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $77.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $-122.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $-772.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $-425.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $-169.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $371.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.4% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | -5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.7% | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | 4.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | 4.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.86× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.56× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
