vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC. (EPRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dine Brands Global, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($217.6M vs $158.8M, roughly 1.4× ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC.). ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC. runs the higher net margin — 37.8% vs -5.6%, a 43.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.8% vs 6.3%). Over the past eight quarters, ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (20.6% CAGR vs 2.7%).
Dine Brands Global Inc. is a publicly traded food and beverage company based in Pasadena, California. Founded in 1958 as IHOP, it operates franchised and corporate owned full-service restaurants including three restaurant concepts, Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar, International House of Pancakes (IHOP), and Fuzzy's Taco Shop.
Essential Properties Realty Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that acquires, owns and manages a diversified portfolio of single-tenant net-leased commercial properties across the United States. Its assets primarily cover essential service-oriented sectors including casual dining, automotive services, medical clinics, early childhood education centers and light industrial facilities, with tenants mostly holding robust long-term operating track records.
DIN vs EPRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $217.6M | $158.8M |
| Net Profit | $-12.2M | $60.0M |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | 56.5% |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | 37.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | 22.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -336.1% | 6.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.79 | $0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $158.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $217.6M | $149.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.2M | $144.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.8M | $137.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.8M | $129.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.8M | $119.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.0M | $117.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.3M | $109.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $68.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $65.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $63.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2M | $56.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $55.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2M | $51.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 56.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | 65.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 64.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 64.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 61.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 66.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 59.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | 61.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | 45.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 45.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 46.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 43.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 42.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 47.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.28 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.79 | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | $0.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.24 | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.50 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.2M | $15.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-273.9M | $4.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $7.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $15.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $128.2M | $60.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.9M | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.2M | $20.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.5M | $47.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.7M | $40.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.6M | $32.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.5M | $23.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-273.9M | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-231.9M | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-212.5M | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-215.7M | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-216.0M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-216.7M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-231.7M | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $6.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $5.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.59× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $53.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $381.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $99.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $77.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5M | $308.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $73.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $81.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.12× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.68× | 1.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | 1.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.88× | 5.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | 1.50× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | 1.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DIN
| Franchisor | $163.2M | 75% |
| Food And Beverage | $27.3M | 13% |
| Proprietary Product Sales And Other | $17.0M | 8% |
| Other | $8.1M | 4% |
| Franchise And Development Fees | $2.0M | 1% |
EPRT
| Rental revenue 1,2 | $149.4M | 94% |
| Other | $8.6M | 5% |
| Other revenue | $779.0K | 0% |
