vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and LendingClub Corp (LC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LendingClub Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.3M vs $217.6M, roughly 1.2× Dine Brands Global, Inc.). LendingClub Corp runs the higher net margin — 20.5% vs -5.6%, a 26.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LendingClub Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 6.3%). Over the past eight quarters, LendingClub Corp's revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 2.7%).
Dine Brands Global Inc. is a publicly traded food and beverage company based in Pasadena, California. Founded in 1958 as IHOP, it operates franchised and corporate owned full-service restaurants including three restaurant concepts, Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar, International House of Pancakes (IHOP), and Fuzzy's Taco Shop.
LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.
DIN vs LC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $217.6M | $252.3M |
| Net Profit | $-12.2M | $51.6M |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | — |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | 20.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | 15.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -336.1% | 341.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.79 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $252.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $217.6M | $266.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.2M | $266.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.8M | $248.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.8M | $217.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.8M | $217.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.0M | $201.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.3M | $187.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $44.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2M | $14.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 8.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.79 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.24 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.50 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-273.9M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $11.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $128.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $0 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-273.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-231.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-212.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-215.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-216.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-216.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-231.7M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $11.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $10.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $9.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $53.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $-2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | $-770.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $-713.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $-339.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5M | $-2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $-669.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $-932.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | $-2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.1M | $-791.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.0M | $-803.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | $-352.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.7M | $-2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $-682.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.2M | $-945.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | -1076.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | -297.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | -323.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -161.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | -1237.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | -338.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | -504.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 52.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 6.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.12× | -17.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.68× | -18.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | -29.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.88× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | -46.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | -62.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DIN
| Franchisor | $163.2M | 75% |
| Food And Beverage | $27.3M | 13% |
| Proprietary Product Sales And Other | $17.0M | 8% |
| Other | $8.1M | 4% |
| Franchise And Development Fees | $2.0M | 1% |
LC
Segment breakdown not available.
