vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and Metallus Inc. (MTUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Metallus Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($308.3M vs $217.6M, roughly 1.4× Dine Brands Global, Inc.). Metallus Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.8% vs -5.6%, a 7.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Metallus Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.9% vs 6.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (2.7% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Dine Brands Global Inc. is a publicly traded food and beverage company based in Pasadena, California. Founded in 1958 as IHOP, it operates franchised and corporate owned full-service restaurants including three restaurant concepts, Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar, International House of Pancakes (IHOP), and Fuzzy's Taco Shop.
DIN vs MTUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $217.6M | $308.3M |
| Net Profit | $-12.2M | $5.4M |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | 8.1% |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | — |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | 1.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | 9.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -336.1% | 315.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.79 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $308.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $217.6M | $267.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.2M | $305.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.8M | $304.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.8M | $280.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.8M | $240.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.0M | $227.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.3M | $294.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2M | $4.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.0% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | 8.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | 2.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | -8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.79 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.24 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.50 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.2M | $104.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-273.9M | $683.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $104.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $128.2M | $156.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.9M | $191.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.2M | $190.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.5M | $180.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.7M | $240.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.6M | $254.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.5M | $272.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $13.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $683.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-273.9M | $686.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-231.9M | $697.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-212.5M | $690.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-215.7M | $686.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-216.0M | $690.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-216.7M | $712.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-231.7M | $736.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.02× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.6% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $53.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $34.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $-38.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5M | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $-15.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $8.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | $-37.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.1M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.0M | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | $-66.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $-32.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.2M | $-5.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | -13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -23.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | -14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | -2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 4.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.12× | 2.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.68× | 9.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | -29.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.88× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | 1.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DIN
| Franchisor | $163.2M | 75% |
| Food And Beverage | $27.3M | 13% |
| Proprietary Product Sales And Other | $17.0M | 8% |
| Other | $8.1M | 4% |
| Franchise And Development Fees | $2.0M | 1% |
MTUS
Segment breakdown not available.