vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dine Brands Global, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($217.6M vs $143.3M, roughly 1.5× Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.). Dine Brands Global, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -5.6% vs -31.4%, a 25.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dine Brands Global, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (2.7% CAGR vs 0.0%).
Dine Brands Global Inc. is a publicly traded food and beverage company based in Pasadena, California. Founded in 1958 as IHOP, it operates franchised and corporate owned full-service restaurants including three restaurant concepts, Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar, International House of Pancakes (IHOP), and Fuzzy's Taco Shop.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
DIN vs PDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $217.6M | $143.3M |
| Net Profit | $-12.2M | $-45.0M |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | — |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | -31.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -336.1% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.79 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $143.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $217.6M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.2M | $139.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.8M | $140.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.8M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.8M | $143.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.0M | $139.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.3M | $143.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-45.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2M | $-9.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -31.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | -30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | -7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | -20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | -6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.79 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.24 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.50 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.2M | $2.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-273.9M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $128.2M | $731.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.9M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.2M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.5M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.7M | $109.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.6M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.5M | $138.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-273.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-231.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-212.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-215.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-216.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-216.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-231.7M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.6% | 110.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $53.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $140.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5M | $198.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $66.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 110.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.68× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.88× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DIN
| Franchisor | $163.2M | 75% |
| Food And Beverage | $27.3M | 13% |
| Proprietary Product Sales And Other | $17.0M | 8% |
| Other | $8.1M | 4% |
| Franchise And Development Fees | $2.0M | 1% |
PDM
Segment breakdown not available.