vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. (WOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($327.5M vs $217.6M, roughly 1.5× Dine Brands Global, Inc.). WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 8.3% vs -5.6%, a 14.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.5% vs 6.3%). WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($39.1M vs $-8.6M).

Dine Brands Global Inc. is a publicly traded food and beverage company based in Pasadena, California. Founded in 1958 as IHOP, it operates franchised and corporate owned full-service restaurants including three restaurant concepts, Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar, International House of Pancakes (IHOP), and Fuzzy's Taco Shop.

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. is an American industrial manufacturing company headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. The company is composed of two business segments, consumer products and building products. Within these segments, the company designs and manufactures pressure vessels such as propane, oxygen and helium tanks, refrigerant and industrial cylinders, camping and residential use cylinders, water system tanks for storage, treatment, heating, expansion and flow control, as well as a variet...

DIN vs WOR — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
WOR
WOR
1.5× larger
WOR
$327.5M
$217.6M
DIN
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
WOR
WOR
+13.2% gap
WOR
19.5%
6.3%
DIN
Higher net margin
WOR
WOR
14.0% more per $
WOR
8.3%
-5.6%
DIN
More free cash flow
WOR
WOR
$47.6M more FCF
WOR
$39.1M
$-8.6M
DIN

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
DIN
DIN
WOR
WOR
Revenue
$217.6M
$327.5M
Net Profit
$-12.2M
$27.3M
Gross Margin
42.4%
25.8%
Operating Margin
-7.6%
3.7%
Net Margin
-5.6%
8.3%
Revenue YoY
6.3%
19.5%
Net Profit YoY
-336.1%
-3.3%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.79
$0.55

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
DIN
DIN
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$217.6M
$327.5M
Q3 25
$216.2M
$303.7M
Q2 25
$230.8M
Q1 25
$214.8M
Q4 24
$204.8M
Q3 24
$195.0M
Q2 24
$206.3M
Q1 24
$206.2M
Net Profit
DIN
DIN
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$-12.2M
$27.3M
Q3 25
$7.3M
$35.1M
Q2 25
$13.8M
Q1 25
$8.2M
Q4 24
$5.2M
Q3 24
$19.1M
Q2 24
$23.2M
Q1 24
$17.5M
Gross Margin
DIN
DIN
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
42.4%
25.8%
Q3 25
39.1%
27.1%
Q2 25
40.0%
Q1 25
42.0%
Q4 24
41.7%
Q3 24
47.8%
Q2 24
48.1%
Q1 24
47.2%
Operating Margin
DIN
DIN
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
-7.6%
3.7%
Q3 25
4.7%
3.0%
Q2 25
8.2%
Q1 25
6.0%
Q4 24
3.8%
Q3 24
13.6%
Q2 24
15.1%
Q1 24
11.7%
Net Margin
DIN
DIN
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
-5.6%
8.3%
Q3 25
3.4%
11.6%
Q2 25
6.0%
Q1 25
3.8%
Q4 24
2.5%
Q3 24
9.8%
Q2 24
11.2%
Q1 24
8.5%
EPS (diluted)
DIN
DIN
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$-0.79
$0.55
Q3 25
$0.48
$0.70
Q2 25
$0.89
Q1 25
$0.53
Q4 24
$0.35
Q3 24
$1.24
Q2 24
$1.50
Q1 24
$1.13

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
DIN
DIN
WOR
WOR
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$128.2M
$180.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.2B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-273.9M
$962.6M
Total Assets
$1.7B
$1.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
DIN
DIN
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$128.2M
$180.3M
Q3 25
$167.9M
$167.1M
Q2 25
$194.2M
Q1 25
$186.5M
Q4 24
$186.7M
Q3 24
$169.6M
Q2 24
$153.5M
Q1 24
$145.0M
Total Debt
DIN
DIN
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$1.2B
Q3 25
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.2B
Q1 25
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.2B
Q1 24
$1.2B
Stockholders' Equity
DIN
DIN
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$-273.9M
$962.6M
Q3 25
$-231.9M
$959.1M
Q2 25
$-212.5M
Q1 25
$-215.7M
Q4 24
$-216.0M
Q3 24
$-216.7M
Q2 24
$-231.7M
Q1 24
$-244.8M
Total Assets
DIN
DIN
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$1.7B
$1.8B
Q3 25
$1.8B
$1.7B
Q2 25
$1.8B
Q1 25
$1.8B
Q4 24
$1.8B
Q3 24
$1.7B
Q2 24
$1.7B
Q1 24
$1.7B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
DIN
DIN
WOR
WOR
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$5.7M
$51.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-8.6M
$39.1M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-3.9%
11.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
6.6%
3.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.89×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$53.4M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
DIN
DIN
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$5.7M
$51.5M
Q3 25
$30.2M
$41.1M
Q2 25
$37.0M
Q1 25
$16.1M
Q4 24
$30.5M
Q3 24
$25.5M
Q2 24
$21.6M
Q1 24
$30.6M
Free Cash Flow
DIN
DIN
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$-8.6M
$39.1M
Q3 25
$18.1M
$27.9M
Q2 25
$31.0M
Q1 25
$12.8M
Q4 24
$26.7M
Q3 24
$22.0M
Q2 24
$18.2M
Q1 24
$27.2M
FCF Margin
DIN
DIN
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
-3.9%
11.9%
Q3 25
8.4%
9.2%
Q2 25
13.4%
Q1 25
6.0%
Q4 24
13.0%
Q3 24
11.3%
Q2 24
8.8%
Q1 24
13.2%
Capex Intensity
DIN
DIN
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
6.6%
3.8%
Q3 25
5.6%
4.3%
Q2 25
2.6%
Q1 25
1.5%
Q4 24
1.9%
Q3 24
1.8%
Q2 24
1.7%
Q1 24
1.6%
Cash Conversion
DIN
DIN
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
1.89×
Q3 25
4.12×
1.17×
Q2 25
2.68×
Q1 25
1.97×
Q4 24
5.88×
Q3 24
1.34×
Q2 24
0.93×
Q1 24
1.75×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

DIN
DIN

Franchisor$163.2M75%
Food And Beverage$27.3M13%
Proprietary Product Sales And Other$17.0M8%
Other$8.1M4%
Franchise And Development Fees$2.0M1%

WOR
WOR

Building Products$207.5M63%
Equity Method Investment Nonconsolidated Investee Other$120.7M37%

Related Comparisons