vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DAILY JOURNAL CORP (DJCO) and Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DAILY JOURNAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($19.5M vs $1.3M, roughly 14.5× Future FinTech Group Inc.). Future FinTech Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — -40.8% vs 5.0%, a 45.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Future FinTech Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (868.2% vs 10.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Future FinTech Group Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.8% CAGR vs 8.6%).
Daily Journal Corporation is an American publishing company and technology company headquartered in Los Angeles, California. The company has offices in the California cities of Corona, Oakland, Riverside, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, and Santa Ana, as well as in Denver, Colorado; Logan, Utah; Phoenix, Arizona; and Melbourne, Australia. Since being led by Charles T. Munger, its newspapers have focused greatly on reporting about the U.S. legal system.
Future plc is a British publishing company founded in 1985 by Chris Anderson. It is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index.
DJCO vs FTFT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $19.5M | $1.3M |
| Net Profit | $-8.0M | $66.8K |
| Gross Margin | — | 1.5% |
| Operating Margin | 2.4% | 40.6% |
| Net Margin | -40.8% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.4% | 868.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -173.2% | 100.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-5.79 | $-0.70 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $19.5M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.4M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.4M | $605.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.2M | $553.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $139.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.9M | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5M | $269.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.6M | $679.2K |
| Q4 25 | $-8.0M | $66.8K | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.2M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9M | $-23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.7M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.4M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.4M | $-3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 95.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 40.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.2% | -158.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.8% | -216.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | -5632.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | -18326.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.7% | -433.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | -387.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | -279.9% |
| Q4 25 | -40.8% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 148.3% | -148.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.6% | 305.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 245.8% | -827.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.5% | -16525.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 134.5% | -475.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 133.5% | -654.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 93.0% | -489.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-5.79 | $-0.70 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.61 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.89 | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.91 | $-58.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.42 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $497.9M | $2.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $383.1M | $44.0M |
| Total Assets | $529.5M | $53.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $497.9M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $513.6M | $1.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | $461.7M | $1.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | $443.3M | $1.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.2M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.7M | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $335.0M | $9.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $307.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $383.1M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $391.1M | $43.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $348.9M | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.4M | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $289.7M | $14.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $278.8M | $37.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $251.9M | $41.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $228.5M | $43.2M |
| Q4 25 | $529.5M | $53.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $548.1M | $54.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.7M | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $468.1M | $23.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $412.6M | $35.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.8M | $53.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $369.9M | $58.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $335.7M | $59.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.9M | $-3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -10.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | -45.86× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $-979.9K | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-569.0K | $-28.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.7M | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.7M | $-7.5M |
| Q4 25 | -10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3249.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | -529.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | -1344.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.1% | -1109.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 31.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 77.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 21.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -45.86× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DJCO
| License And Maintenance | $8.5M | 44% |
| Service Other | $4.5M | 23% |
| Advertising Service Fees And Other | $3.3M | 17% |
| Consulting Fees | $2.2M | 11% |
| Subscription And Circulation | $1.1M | 6% |
FTFT
Segment breakdown not available.
