vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DAILY JOURNAL CORP (DJCO) and TripAdvisor, Inc. (TRIP), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TripAdvisor, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($411.0M vs $19.5M, roughly 21.0× DAILY JOURNAL CORP). TripAdvisor, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -40.8% vs -9.2%, a 31.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DAILY JOURNAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.4% vs 0.0%). DAILY JOURNAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.9M vs $-122.0M). Over the past eight quarters, DAILY JOURNAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (8.6% CAGR vs 2.0%).
Daily Journal Corporation is an American publishing company and technology company headquartered in Los Angeles, California. The company has offices in the California cities of Corona, Oakland, Riverside, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, and Santa Ana, as well as in Denver, Colorado; Logan, Utah; Phoenix, Arizona; and Melbourne, Australia. Since being led by Charles T. Munger, its newspapers have focused greatly on reporting about the U.S. legal system.
Tripadvisor is an American company that operates online travel agencies, comparison shopping websites, and mobile apps with user-generated content.
DJCO vs TRIP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $19.5M | $411.0M |
| Net Profit | $-8.0M | $-38.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 91.5% |
| Operating Margin | 2.4% | -8.3% |
| Net Margin | -40.8% | -9.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.4% | 0.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -173.2% | -3900.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-5.79 | $-0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $19.5M | $411.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.4M | $553.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.4M | $529.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.2M | $398.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $411.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.9M | $532.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5M | $497.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.6M | $395.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.0M | $-38.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.2M | $53.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9M | $1.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.7M | $39.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.4M | $24.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.4M | $-59.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 91.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 92.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 92.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 93.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 93.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 92.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 92.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 93.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.2% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.8% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | -3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.7% | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | -3.8% |
| Q4 25 | -40.8% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 148.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.6% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 245.8% | -2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 134.5% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 133.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 93.0% | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-5.79 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.28 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.91 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $497.9M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $819.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $383.1M | $645.0M |
| Total Assets | $529.5M | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.27× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $497.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $513.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $461.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $443.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $335.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $307.6M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $819.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $821.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $822.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $831.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $832.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $383.1M | $645.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $391.1M | $707.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $348.9M | $627.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.4M | $643.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $289.7M | $943.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $278.8M | $944.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $251.9M | $857.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $228.5M | $825.0M |
| Q4 25 | $529.5M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $548.1M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.7M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $468.1M | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $412.6M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.8M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $369.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $335.7M | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.16× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.9M | $-103.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.9M | $-122.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -10.0% | -29.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 0.0% | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $163.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | $-103.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $202.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-569.0K | $102.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1M | $-43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $51.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.7M | $139.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | $-122.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $177.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $83.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1M | $-63.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.7M | $123.0M |
| Q4 25 | -10.0% | -29.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.1% | 31.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.11× | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 5.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.20× | -3.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.12× | -1.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.07× | 2.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DJCO
| License And Maintenance | $8.5M | 44% |
| Service Other | $4.5M | 23% |
| Advertising Service Fees And Other | $3.3M | 17% |
| Consulting Fees | $2.2M | 11% |
| Subscription And Circulation | $1.1M | 6% |
TRIP
| Third Party | $327.0M | 80% |
| The Fork | $58.0M | 14% |
| Other | $26.0M | 6% |
