vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $395.6M, roughly 1.4× Dolby Laboratories, Inc.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 24.0%, a 5.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.1% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.9% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

DLB vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.4× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$395.6M
DLB
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
DLB
DLB
+3.1% gap
DLB
7.1%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
5.8% more per $
KIM
29.8%
24.0%
DLB
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
DLB
DLB
Annualised
DLB
13.9%
5.6%
KIM

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
DLB
DLB
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$395.6M
$558.0M
Net Profit
$94.9M
$166.3M
Gross Margin
88.7%
Operating Margin
28.5%
37.2%
Net Margin
24.0%
29.8%
Revenue YoY
7.1%
4.0%
Net Profit YoY
3.4%
23.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.99
$0.46

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
DLB
DLB
KIM
KIM
Q2 26
$395.6M
Q1 26
$346.7M
$558.0M
Q4 25
$346.7M
$542.5M
Q3 25
$307.0M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$315.5M
$525.2M
Q1 25
$369.6M
$536.6M
Q4 24
$357.0M
$525.4M
Q3 24
$304.8M
$507.6M
Net Profit
DLB
DLB
KIM
KIM
Q2 26
$94.9M
Q1 26
$53.3M
$166.3M
Q4 25
$53.3M
$151.2M
Q3 25
$49.3M
$137.8M
Q2 25
$46.1M
$163.0M
Q1 25
$91.8M
$132.8M
Q4 24
$67.8M
$166.0M
Q3 24
$58.6M
$136.0M
Gross Margin
DLB
DLB
KIM
KIM
Q2 26
88.7%
Q1 26
87.5%
Q4 25
87.5%
Q3 25
87.1%
Q2 25
86.1%
Q1 25
90.3%
Q4 24
88.6%
Q3 24
88.8%
Operating Margin
DLB
DLB
KIM
KIM
Q2 26
28.5%
Q1 26
17.9%
37.2%
Q4 25
17.9%
36.4%
Q3 25
9.7%
34.9%
Q2 25
15.1%
39.2%
Q1 25
29.2%
33.6%
Q4 24
22.4%
31.7%
Q3 24
15.2%
33.7%
Net Margin
DLB
DLB
KIM
KIM
Q2 26
24.0%
Q1 26
15.4%
29.8%
Q4 25
15.4%
27.9%
Q3 25
16.1%
25.7%
Q2 25
14.6%
31.0%
Q1 25
24.8%
24.8%
Q4 24
19.0%
31.6%
Q3 24
19.2%
26.8%
EPS (diluted)
DLB
DLB
KIM
KIM
Q2 26
$0.99
Q1 26
$0.55
$0.46
Q4 25
$0.55
Q3 25
$0.50
Q2 25
$0.48
Q1 25
$0.94
Q4 24
$0.70
Q3 24
$0.59

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
DLB
DLB
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$594.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.6B
$10.4B
Total Assets
$3.2B
$19.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
DLB
DLB
KIM
KIM
Q2 26
$594.7M
Q1 26
$644.6M
Q4 25
$644.6M
$211.6M
Q3 25
$702.6M
$159.3M
Q2 25
$699.3M
$226.6M
Q1 25
$626.6M
$131.3M
Q4 24
$520.8M
$688.6M
Q3 24
$482.0M
$789.0M
Total Debt
DLB
DLB
KIM
KIM
Q2 26
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
Q3 24
Stockholders' Equity
DLB
DLB
KIM
KIM
Q2 26
$2.6B
Q1 26
$2.6B
$10.4B
Q4 25
$2.6B
$10.4B
Q3 25
$2.6B
$10.5B
Q2 25
$2.6B
$10.5B
Q1 25
$2.6B
$10.6B
Q4 24
$2.5B
$10.7B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$10.5B
Total Assets
DLB
DLB
KIM
KIM
Q2 26
$3.2B
Q1 26
$3.2B
$19.6B
Q4 25
$3.2B
$19.7B
Q3 25
$3.2B
$19.9B
Q2 25
$3.2B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$3.2B
$19.7B
Q4 24
$3.2B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$3.1B
$20.1B
Debt / Equity
DLB
DLB
KIM
KIM
Q2 26
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
DLB
DLB
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$147.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.55×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
DLB
DLB
KIM
KIM
Q2 26
$147.3M
Q1 26
$54.8M
Q4 25
$54.8M
$258.4M
Q3 25
$472.2M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$67.7M
$305.4M
Q1 25
$174.9M
$223.8M
Q4 24
$106.8M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$327.3M
$295.9M
Free Cash Flow
DLB
DLB
KIM
KIM
Q2 26
Q1 26
Q4 25
$50.2M
Q3 25
$435.9M
Q2 25
$61.3M
Q1 25
$168.0M
$205.4M
Q4 24
$100.0M
Q3 24
$297.2M
FCF Margin
DLB
DLB
KIM
KIM
Q2 26
Q1 26
Q4 25
14.5%
Q3 25
142.0%
Q2 25
19.4%
Q1 25
45.5%
38.3%
Q4 24
28.0%
Q3 24
97.5%
Capex Intensity
DLB
DLB
KIM
KIM
Q2 26
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.3%
0.0%
Q3 25
11.8%
0.0%
Q2 25
2.0%
0.0%
Q1 25
1.9%
3.4%
Q4 24
1.9%
Q3 24
9.8%
Cash Conversion
DLB
DLB
KIM
KIM
Q2 26
1.55×
Q1 26
1.03×
Q4 25
1.03×
1.71×
Q3 25
9.57×
2.41×
Q2 25
1.47×
1.87×
Q1 25
1.91×
1.69×
Q4 24
1.57×
1.44×
Q3 24
5.59×
2.18×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

DLB
DLB

Licensing$372.2M94%
Products and services$23.4M6%

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

Related Comparisons