vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and Koppers Holdings Inc. (KOP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Koppers Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($432.7M vs $395.6M, roughly 1.1× Dolby Laboratories, Inc.). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs 6.9%, a 17.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.1% vs -9.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.9% CAGR vs -6.7%).
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
Koppers is a global chemical and materials company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. Its headquarters is an art-deco 1920s skyscraper, the Koppers Tower.
DLB vs KOP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $395.6M | $432.7M |
| Net Profit | $94.9M | $29.7M |
| Gross Margin | 88.7% | 25.6% |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | 11.5% |
| Net Margin | 24.0% | 6.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.1% | -9.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | 391.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.99 | $1.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $395.6M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $346.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $346.7M | $432.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $485.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.5M | $504.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $369.6M | $456.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | $477.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $304.8M | $554.3M |
| Q2 26 | $94.9M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.3M | $29.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.8M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.8M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $22.8M |
| Q2 26 | 88.7% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 87.5% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.1% | 24.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.1% | 22.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.3% | 23.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.6% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 88.8% | 21.9% |
| Q2 26 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 9.0% |
| Q2 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.2% | 4.1% |
| Q2 26 | $0.99 | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $1.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | $1.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.48 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.59 | $1.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $594.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $928.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $574.0M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.62× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $594.7M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $644.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $644.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $702.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $699.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $626.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $520.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $482.0M | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $928.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $932.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $977.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $989.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $939.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $989.4M |
| Q2 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $574.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $545.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $526.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $498.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $488.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $532.3M |
| Q2 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $2.0B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.92× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.86× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $147.3M | $45.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $28.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.55× | 1.52× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $67.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $147.3M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $54.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8M | $45.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $472.2M | $49.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.7M | $50.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.9M | $-22.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | $74.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.3M | $29.8M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.2M | $28.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $435.9M | $37.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.3M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.0M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $297.2M | $14.4M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 142.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.5% | -8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 97.5% | 2.6% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 2.8% |
| Q2 26 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.03× | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.57× | 2.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | 3.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.59× | 1.31× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLB
| Licensing | $372.2M | 94% |
| Products and services | $23.4M | 6% |
KOP
| Other | $127.8M | 30% |
| Railroad Treated Products | $119.0M | 28% |
| Utility Poles | $79.8M | 18% |
| Pitch And Related Products | $74.1M | 17% |
| Carbon Black Feedstock And Distillates | $14.4M | 3% |
| Railroad Infrastructure Products And Services | $9.9M | 2% |
| Phthalic Anhydride Naphthalene And Other Chemicals | $7.7M | 2% |
