vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($395.6M vs $349.4M, roughly 1.1× INTERFACE INC). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs 7.0%, a 17.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.1% vs 4.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.9% CAGR vs 9.8%).
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
DLB vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $395.6M | $349.4M |
| Net Profit | $94.9M | $24.4M |
| Gross Margin | 88.7% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | 24.0% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.1% | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | 12.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.99 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $395.6M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $346.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $346.7M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.5M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $369.6M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $304.8M | $344.3M |
| Q2 26 | $94.9M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.3M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.8M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.8M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $28.4M |
| Q2 26 | 88.7% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 87.5% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.1% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.1% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.3% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.6% | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 88.8% | 37.1% |
| Q2 26 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 12.3% |
| Q2 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.2% | 8.3% |
| Q2 26 | $0.99 | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.48 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.59 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $594.7M | $71.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $181.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $640.7M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $594.7M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $644.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $644.6M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $702.6M | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $699.3M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $626.6M | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $520.8M | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $482.0M | $115.6M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $337.9M |
| Q2 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $501.6M |
| Q2 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $1.2B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $147.3M | $49.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $28.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.55× | 2.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $121.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $147.3M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $54.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $472.2M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.7M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.9M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.3M | $76.2M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.2M | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $435.9M | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.3M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $297.2M | $69.7M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 142.0% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 97.5% | 20.3% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 1.9% |
| Q2 26 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.03× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.57× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.91× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.57× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.59× | 2.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLB
| Licensing | $372.2M | 94% |
| Products and services | $23.4M | 6% |
TILE
| AMS | $205.9M | 59% |
| EAAA | $143.5M | 41% |
