vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DULUTH HOLDINGS INC. (DLTH) and Information Services Group Inc. (III). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DULUTH HOLDINGS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($114.9M vs $61.2M, roughly 1.9× Information Services Group Inc.). Information Services Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -8.8%, a 13.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Information Services Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.9% vs -9.6%). Information Services Group Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.3M vs $-8.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Information Services Group Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-2.4% CAGR vs -31.6%).
Duluth Holdings Inc., which primarily sells goods through its Duluth Trading Company brand, is an American workwear and accessories company.
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
DLTH vs III — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $114.9M | $61.2M |
| Net Profit | $-10.1M | $2.6M |
| Gross Margin | 53.8% | 44.8% |
| Operating Margin | -7.7% | 8.4% |
| Net Margin | -8.8% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.6% | 5.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 64.6% | -14.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.29 | $0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $114.9M | $61.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.7M | $62.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.7M | $61.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.3M | $59.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.6M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.7M | $64.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $245.6M | $64.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-10.1M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.6M | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-28.2M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.9M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4M | $-3.4M |
| Q4 25 | 53.8% | 44.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 54.7% | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.0% | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.1% | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.3% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.3% | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.8% | 39.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.2% | 36.1% |
| Q4 25 | -7.7% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.8% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.7% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | -3.7% |
| Q4 25 | -8.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.29 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.45 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.17 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.84 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.24 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.20 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.2M | $28.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $160.6M | $94.7M |
| Total Assets | $468.0M | $211.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7M | $28.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.8M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.2M | $14.0M |
| Q4 25 | $160.6M | $94.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $170.0M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.9M | $94.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.7M | $95.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $188.1M | $96.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $215.7M | $96.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $218.4M | $95.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $222.8M | $95.6M |
| Q4 25 | $468.0M | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $433.8M | $213.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $463.7M | $200.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $452.4M | $202.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $533.1M | $204.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $488.6M | $227.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $471.4M | $235.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $491.2M | $234.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-6.7M | $5.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.9M | $4.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -7.8% | 7.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7M | $25.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-6.7M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.5M | $11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.2M | $978.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.1M | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.6M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.7M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.7M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.9M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.8M | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-57.8M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.7M | $141.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-43.7M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-35.2M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.6M | $1.3M |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -56.3% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -34.4% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -30.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.7% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.40× | 3.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.86× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLTH
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $67.4M | 59% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $47.4M | 41% |
III
Segment breakdown not available.