vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DULUTH HOLDINGS INC. (DLTH) and KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($199.6M vs $114.9M, roughly 1.7× DULUTH HOLDINGS INC.). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs -8.8%, a 17.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs -9.6%). DULUTH HOLDINGS INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-8.9M vs $-11.6M).
Duluth Holdings Inc., which primarily sells goods through its Duluth Trading Company brand, is an American workwear and accessories company.
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
DLTH vs KLIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $114.9M | $199.6M |
| Net Profit | $-10.1M | $16.8M |
| Gross Margin | 53.8% | 49.6% |
| Operating Margin | -7.7% | 8.9% |
| Net Margin | -8.8% | 8.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.6% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 64.6% | -79.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.29 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $199.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $114.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-10.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-28.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 49.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 54.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.29 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.45 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.84 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.24 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.2M | $481.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $160.6M | $825.0M |
| Total Assets | $468.0M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $481.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $825.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $160.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $170.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $188.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $215.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $218.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $468.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $433.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $463.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $452.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $533.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $488.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $471.4M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-6.7M | $-8.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.9M | $-11.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -7.8% | -5.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-6.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-11.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-57.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-43.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-35.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -56.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -34.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -30.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.40× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLTH
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $67.4M | 59% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $47.4M | 41% |
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |
