vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DULUTH HOLDINGS INC. (DLTH) and Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DULUTH HOLDINGS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($114.9M vs $57.8M, roughly 2.0× Nano Dimension Ltd.). DULUTH HOLDINGS INC. runs the higher net margin — -8.8% vs -171.1%, a 162.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. DULUTH HOLDINGS INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-8.9M vs $-21.1M).
Duluth Holdings Inc., which primarily sells goods through its Duluth Trading Company brand, is an American workwear and accessories company.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
DLTH vs NNDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $114.9M | $57.8M |
| Net Profit | $-10.1M | $-98.8M |
| Gross Margin | 53.8% | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | -7.7% | -155.1% |
| Net Margin | -8.8% | -171.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 64.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.29 | $-0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $114.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.1M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.7M | $28.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $245.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-10.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-28.2M | $-98.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.9M | $-79.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 53.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 54.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.3% | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.8% | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.4% | -155.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.2% | -171.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.7% | -279.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.29 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.45 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.84 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.24 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.20 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.2M | $317.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $160.6M | $860.0M |
| Total Assets | $468.0M | $902.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3M | $317.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8M | $231.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $160.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $170.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $188.1M | $860.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $215.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $218.4M | $870.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $222.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $468.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $433.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $463.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $452.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $533.1M | $902.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $488.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $471.4M | $911.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $491.2M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-6.7M | $-18.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.9M | $-21.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -7.8% | -36.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-6.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.1M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.7M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-57.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-43.7M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-35.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -56.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -34.4% | -36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -30.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.40× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.86× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLTH
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $67.4M | 59% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $47.4M | 41% |
NNDM
Segment breakdown not available.
