vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DELUXE CORP (DLX) and EnerSys (ENS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EnerSys is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($919.1M vs $535.2M, roughly 1.7× DELUXE CORP). EnerSys runs the higher net margin — 9.8% vs 2.2%, a 7.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DELUXE CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.8% vs 1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, EnerSys's revenue compounded faster (0.5% CAGR vs 0.0%).
Deluxe Corporation is an American company that provides payment processing, data services, checks and promotional products, and merchant services. It operates in four divisions: B2B payments, data, print, and merchant services. As of 2025, the company serves millions of small businesses and thousands of financial institutions, processing more than $2.8 trillion in payments annually. While its legacy business centers on check printing and other printed products, payments and data services now ...
EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.
DLX vs ENS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $535.2M | $919.1M |
| Net Profit | $12.0M | $90.4M |
| Gross Margin | 52.2% | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | 13.5% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | 9.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.8% | 1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -5.0% | -21.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.25 | $2.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $535.2M | $919.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $540.2M | $951.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.3M | $893.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.5M | $974.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $520.6M | $906.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $528.4M | $883.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $537.8M | $852.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $535.0M | $910.7M |
| Q4 25 | $12.0M | $90.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.7M | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.4M | $57.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $96.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.6M | $114.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $82.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.5M | $70.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $60.9M |
| Q4 25 | 52.2% | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.9% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.6% | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.4% | 31.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.3% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 53.3% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.7% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 53.0% | 27.9% |
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.7% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.25 | $2.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.74 | $1.80 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | $1.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | $2.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $2.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $2.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.46 | $1.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.24 | $1.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $36.9M | $450.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $680.7M | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $36.9M | $450.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.8M | $388.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0M | $346.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.3M | $343.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.4M | $463.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.3M | $407.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.1M | $344.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.5M | $333.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $802.0M |
| Q4 25 | $680.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $664.1M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $638.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $620.9M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $612.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $620.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $608.4M | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.1M | $184.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $171.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 18.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 8.53× | 2.04× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $441.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $102.1M | $184.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.1M | $218.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.1M | $968.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.3M | $135.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $81.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.9M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.6M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $171.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $197.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $-32.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $104.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $56.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.7M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.4M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.53× | 2.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.99× | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.28× | 0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.59× | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.77× | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.60× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.94× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.46× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLX
| Services | $247.9M | 46% |
| B2B Payments | $76.3M | 14% |
| Datadrivenmarketingsolutions | $68.5M | 13% |
| Promotional Solutions Revenue | $60.9M | 11% |
| Treasurymanagementsolutions | $59.8M | 11% |
| Other | $17.3M | 3% |
| Other Web Based Solutions | $4.6M | 1% |
ENS
| Energy Systems | $399.5M | 43% |
| Motive Power | $352.0M | 38% |
| Services | $92.6M | 10% |
| Transferred Over Time | $38.2M | 4% |
| Other | $36.8M | 4% |
