vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DELUXE CORP (DLX) and HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DELUXE CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($535.2M vs $270.8M, roughly 2.0× HUTCHMED (China) Ltd). DELUXE CORP runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs 0.7%, a 1.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DELUXE CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.8% vs -16.5%).
Deluxe Corporation is an American company that provides payment processing, data services, checks and promotional products, and merchant services. It operates in four divisions: B2B payments, data, print, and merchant services. As of 2025, the company serves millions of small businesses and thousands of financial institutions, processing more than $2.8 trillion in payments annually. While its legacy business centers on check printing and other printed products, payments and data services now ...
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
DLX vs HCM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $535.2M | $270.8M |
| Net Profit | $12.0M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | 52.2% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | -13.2% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.8% | -16.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -5.0% | -83.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.25 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $535.2M | $270.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $540.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.3M | $277.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.5M | $324.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $520.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $528.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $537.8M | $305.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $535.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.0M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.4M | $455.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.5M | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 52.2% | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.4% | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.7% | 41.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 53.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.7% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | -9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 163.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.25 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.74 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.46 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.24 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $36.9M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $93.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $680.7M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $36.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.3M | $836.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.1M | $802.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $93.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $82.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $82.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $680.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $664.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $638.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.5M | $759.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $620.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $612.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $620.5M | $740.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $608.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.1M | $8.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $3.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 8.53× | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-96.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $102.1M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.1M | $-72.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.3M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.6M | $-39.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $-82.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.4M | $-49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | -29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.53× | 4.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.99× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.28× | -0.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.59× | 3.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.77× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.94× | -1.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.46× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLX
| Services | $247.9M | 46% |
| B2B Payments | $76.3M | 14% |
| Datadrivenmarketingsolutions | $68.5M | 13% |
| Promotional Solutions Revenue | $60.9M | 11% |
| Treasurymanagementsolutions | $59.8M | 11% |
| Other | $17.3M | 3% |
| Other Web Based Solutions | $4.6M | 1% |
HCM
Segment breakdown not available.
