vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DELUXE CORP (DLX) and KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DELUXE CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($535.2M vs $272.2M, roughly 2.0× KILROY REALTY CORP). KILROY REALTY CORP runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs 2.2%, a 4.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DELUXE CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.8% vs -5.0%). Over the past eight quarters, DELUXE CORP's revenue compounded faster (0.0% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Deluxe Corporation is an American company that provides payment processing, data services, checks and promotional products, and merchant services. It operates in four divisions: B2B payments, data, print, and merchant services. As of 2025, the company serves millions of small businesses and thousands of financial institutions, processing more than $2.8 trillion in payments annually. While its legacy business centers on check printing and other printed products, payments and data services now ...
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
DLX vs KRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $535.2M | $272.2M |
| Net Profit | $12.0M | $17.1M |
| Gross Margin | 52.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.8% | -5.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -5.0% | -73.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.25 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $535.2M | $272.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $540.2M | $279.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.3M | $289.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.5M | $270.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $520.6M | $286.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $528.4M | $289.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $537.8M | $280.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $535.0M | $278.6M |
| Q4 25 | $12.0M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.7M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.4M | $79.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $43.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.6M | $65.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.5M | $54.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $55.7M |
| Q4 25 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 53.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 58.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 27.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 16.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 20.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.25 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.74 | $1.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | $0.57 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.46 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.24 | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $36.9M | $179.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $680.7M | $5.4B |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $10.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $36.9M | $179.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.8M | $372.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0M | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.3M | $146.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.4M | $165.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.3M | $625.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.1M | $835.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.5M | $855.0M |
| Q4 25 | $680.7M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $664.1M | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $638.7M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.5M | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $620.9M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $612.7M | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $620.5M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $608.4M | $5.4B |
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $10.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $10.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $11.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.1M | $566.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $450.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 165.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 42.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 8.53× | 33.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $833.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $102.1M | $566.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.1M | $176.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.1M | $143.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.3M | $136.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $541.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.9M | $176.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.6M | $88.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.6M | $167.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $450.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $148.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $118.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $115.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $440.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.7M | $147.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.4M | $69.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1M | $151.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 165.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 42.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 153.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | 54.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | 8.53× | 33.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.99× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.28× | 1.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.59× | 3.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.77× | 8.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.60× | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.94× | 1.63× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.46× | 3.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLX
| Services | $247.9M | 46% |
| B2B Payments | $76.3M | 14% |
| Datadrivenmarketingsolutions | $68.5M | 13% |
| Promotional Solutions Revenue | $60.9M | 11% |
| Treasurymanagementsolutions | $59.8M | 11% |
| Other | $17.3M | 3% |
| Other Web Based Solutions | $4.6M | 1% |
KRC
Segment breakdown not available.