vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc. (DNTH) and Classover Holdings, Inc. (KIDZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Classover Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($537.1K vs $284.0K, roughly 1.9× Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc.). Classover Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1005.8% vs -22687.3%, a 21681.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Dianthus Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical firm focused on developing targeted therapies for rare immunological and inflammatory diseases. It advances antibody-based candidates to address unmet needs of severe patients, operating primarily in the U.S. with global development partners.
Classover Holdings, Inc. is an education technology company that provides live interactive online learning courses targeted primarily at children aged 3 to 12. Its core service portfolio includes STEM, language learning, arts, and social skill development programs, with main markets covering the United States and global Chinese-speaking family segments.
DNTH vs KIDZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $284.0K | $537.1K |
| Net Profit | $-64.4M | $-5.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 54.1% |
| Operating Margin | -24486.3% | -184.7% |
| Net Margin | -22687.3% | -1005.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -78.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -126.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.53 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $284.0K | $537.1K | ||
| Q3 25 | $396.0K | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $725.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $816.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $874.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-64.4M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-36.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-29.5M | $-297.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-28.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 54.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -24486.3% | -184.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10173.7% | -47.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -234.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2852.7% | -36.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2406.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1376.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1191.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2041.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -22687.3% | -1005.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9284.1% | 195.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -532.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2537.5% | -36.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2144.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1159.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -945.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1573.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.53 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.97 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.82 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.76 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.74 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.51 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.54 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $404.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $493.4M | $3.8M |
| Total Assets | $530.9M | $15.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $404.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $263.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $275.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $281.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $360.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $377.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $493.4M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $546.5M | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $328.6M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $337.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $358.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $372.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $530.9M | $15.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $577.4M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $348.6M | $1.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $354.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $369.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $382.5M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-47.0M | $-652.2K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-47.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16591.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 48.6% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-132.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $-652.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-30.6M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-336.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.6M | $-288.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-27.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-47.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-30.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-27.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | -16591.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7717.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2377.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2072.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -980.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -780.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1713.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 48.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
