vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc. (DNTH) and Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($284.0K vs $198.0K, roughly 1.4× Quantum Computing Inc.). Quantum Computing Inc. runs the higher net margin — -785.9% vs -22687.3%, a 21901.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Quantum Computing Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (219.4% vs -78.6%). Quantum Computing Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-12.2M vs $-47.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Quantum Computing Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (99.0% CAGR vs -44.6%).
Dianthus Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical firm focused on developing targeted therapies for rare immunological and inflammatory diseases. It advances antibody-based candidates to address unmet needs of severe patients, operating primarily in the U.S. with global development partners.
Rigetti Computing, Inc. is a Berkeley, California-based developer of superconducting quantum integrated circuits used for quantum computers. Rigetti also develops a cloud platform called Forest that enables programmers to write quantum algorithms.
DNTH vs QUBT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $284.0K | $198.0K |
| Net Profit | $-64.4M | $-1.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | -49.5% |
| Operating Margin | -24486.3% | -11220.2% |
| Net Margin | -22687.3% | -785.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -78.6% | 219.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -126.6% | 97.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.53 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $284.0K | $198.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $396.0K | $384.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $61.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $62.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $101.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9M | $183.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $874.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-64.4M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-36.8M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-36.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-29.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-28.4M | $-51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.2M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.6M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 54.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -24486.3% | -11220.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10173.7% | -2709.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -16673.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2852.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2406.9% | -14375.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1376.6% | -5384.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1191.8% | -2878.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2041.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -22687.3% | -785.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9284.1% | 620.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -59806.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2537.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2144.8% | -82640.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1159.0% | -5618.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -945.1% | -2838.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1573.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.53 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.97 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.82 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.76 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.74 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.51 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.54 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $404.3M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $493.4M | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $530.9M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $404.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.6M | $555.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $348.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $263.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $275.2M | $78.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $281.1M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $360.7M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $377.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $493.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $546.5M | $877.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $396.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $328.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.5M | $107.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $337.9M | $60.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $358.2M | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $372.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $530.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $577.4M | $898.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $426.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $348.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.0M | $153.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $354.2M | $76.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $369.0M | $76.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $382.5M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-47.0M | $-11.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-47.1M | $-12.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16591.9% | -6147.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 48.6% | 583.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-132.8M | $-37.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-30.6M | $-8.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-27.4M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.3M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.5M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-47.1M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-30.6M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-27.5M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.3M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.5M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | -16591.9% | -6147.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7717.2% | -3000.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -11683.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2377.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2072.0% | -10709.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -980.3% | -5040.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -780.7% | -2782.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1713.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 48.6% | 583.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 723.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1678.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 4622.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 508.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 588.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.67× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
