vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC (ESE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($392.4M vs $289.7M, roughly 1.4× ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC). ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs -7.1%, a 17.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.3% vs -2.9%). ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($63.0M vs $27.9M). Over the past eight quarters, ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (7.8% CAGR vs -5.9%).
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is an American multinational doughnut company and coffeehouse chain. Krispy Kreme was founded by Vernon Rudolph (1915–1973), who bought a yeast-raised recipe from a New Orleans chef, rented a building in 1937 in what is now historic Old Salem in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and began selling to local grocery stores. Steady growth preceded an ambitious expansion as a public company in the period 2000 to 2016, which ultimately proved unprofitable. In 2016, the company retur...
Esco is a Singaporean brand that develops, manufactures, and sells products and services for laboratories.
DNUT vs ESE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $392.4M | $289.7M |
| Net Profit | $-27.8M | $28.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.4% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | 13.2% |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.8% | 22.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $1.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $392.4M | $289.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.3M | $286.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.8M | $296.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.2M | $265.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.0M | $247.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.9M | $298.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.8M | $260.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $442.7M | $249.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-27.8M | $28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.4M | $218.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-435.3M | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.3M | $31.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.4M | $23.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $34.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.5M | $23.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 41.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.8% |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.4% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 11.7% |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.6% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.9% | 9.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | $1.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $8.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.55 | $1.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $1.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.91 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $1.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $1.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $0.90 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $42.4M | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $911.9M | $145.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $650.1M | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | 0.09× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $101.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $78.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | $57.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | $63.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.1M | $59.4M |
| Q4 25 | $911.9M | $145.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.2M | $186.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $889.4M | $525.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $935.0M | $88.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.5M | $112.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | $122.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $895.0M | $173.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $881.8M | $191.0M |
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | 0.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | 0.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | 0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 0.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | 0.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.0M | $68.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | $63.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.1% | 21.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.0M | $239.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $68.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $109.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.5M | $73.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.8M | $24.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | $34.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $36.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.7M | $10.5M |
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $97.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.8M | $64.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | $14.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.9M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | $60.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-46.8M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.0% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 20.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.6% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 2.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.45× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DNUT
Segment breakdown not available.
ESE
| US Government | $98.0M | 34% |
| Utility Solutions Group | $87.5M | 30% |
| RF Shielding And Test | $58.3M | 20% |
| Commercial | $45.8M | 16% |
| Related Party | $1.3M | 0% |
