vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and Gogo Inc. (GOGO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($392.4M vs $230.6M, roughly 1.7× Gogo Inc.). Gogo Inc. runs the higher net margin — -4.3% vs -7.1%, a 2.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gogo Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (67.3% vs -2.9%). Krispy Kreme, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.9M vs $-25.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Gogo Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (48.7% CAGR vs -5.9%).
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is an American multinational doughnut company and coffeehouse chain. Krispy Kreme was founded by Vernon Rudolph (1915–1973), who bought a yeast-raised recipe from a New Orleans chef, rented a building in 1937 in what is now historic Old Salem in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and began selling to local grocery stores. Steady growth preceded an ambitious expansion as a public company in the period 2000 to 2016, which ultimately proved unprofitable. In 2016, the company retur...
Gogo Inc. is an American provider of in-flight broadband Internet service and other connectivity services for business aircraft, headquartered in Broomfield, Colorado. Through its Gogo LLC subsidiary, Gogo previously provided in-flight WiFi to 17 airlines until the Commercial Air business was sold to Intelsat for $400 million in December 2020. According to Gogo, over 2,500 commercial aircraft and 6,600 business aircraft have been equipped with its onboard Wi-Fi services. The company is the de...
DNUT vs GOGO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $392.4M | $230.6M |
| Net Profit | $-27.8M | $-10.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | 6.2% |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | -4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 67.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.8% | 64.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $-0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $392.4M | $230.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.3M | $223.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.8M | $226.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.2M | $230.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.0M | $137.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.9M | $100.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.8M | $102.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $442.7M | $104.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-27.8M | $-10.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.4M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-435.3M | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.3M | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.4M | $-28.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | $839.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.5M | $30.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 87.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 87.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.4% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | -17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 21.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 33.2% |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | -4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.6% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | -20.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.9% | 29.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.55 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $42.4M | $125.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $911.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $650.1M | $101.1M |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | $125.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $102.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | $70.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $41.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | $176.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | $161.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.1M | $152.8M |
| Q4 25 | $911.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $889.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $935.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $895.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $881.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | $101.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.3M | $107.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.6M | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $82.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $69.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $52.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $62.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $810.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $802.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $809.0M |
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.0M | $8.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | $-25.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.1% | -11.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 14.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.0M | $65.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $46.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.5M | $36.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.8M | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | $-38.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $24.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.7M | $29.7M |
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | $-25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.8M | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | $29.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.9M | $-42.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-46.8M | $28.2M |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | -11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.0% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.5% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | -30.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.6% | 27.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 2.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.74× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DNUT
Segment breakdown not available.
GOGO
| Services | $191.9M | 83% |
| Products | $38.7M | 17% |
| Fcc Reimbursement Program | $2.0M | 1% |
