vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hillenbrand, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($550.2M vs $392.4M, roughly 1.4× Krispy Kreme, Inc.). Hillenbrand, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -0.4% vs -7.1%, a 6.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Krispy Kreme, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.9% vs -22.2%). Krispy Kreme, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.9M vs $-31.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Krispy Kreme, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-5.9% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is an American multinational doughnut company and coffeehouse chain. Krispy Kreme was founded by Vernon Rudolph (1915–1973), who bought a yeast-raised recipe from a New Orleans chef, rented a building in 1937 in what is now historic Old Salem in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and began selling to local grocery stores. Steady growth preceded an ambitious expansion as a public company in the period 2000 to 2016, which ultimately proved unprofitable. In 2016, the company retur...
Hillenbrand, Inc. is a global diversified industrial firm that designs, manufactures, and distributes specialized processing equipment and durable industrial solutions. It serves food & beverage, agriculture, manufacturing, waste management sectors, with operations across North America, Europe, and APAC.
DNUT vs HI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $392.4M | $550.2M |
| Net Profit | $-27.8M | $-2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.4% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | -2.2% |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | -0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | -22.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.8% | -134.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $392.4M | $550.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.3M | $652.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.8M | $598.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.2M | $715.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.0M | $706.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.9M | $837.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.8M | $786.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $442.7M | $785.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-27.8M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.4M | $75.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-435.3M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.3M | $-40.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.4M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | $-248.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.5M | $6.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.9% |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | -2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | -32.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | -31.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.9% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $1.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.55 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $-0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $-3.53 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $42.4M | $173.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $911.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $650.1M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $4.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | $173.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $164.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $162.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | $458.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | $223.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.1M | $224.4M |
| Q4 25 | $911.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $889.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $935.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $895.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $881.8M | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $5.6B |
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 1.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | 1.48× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | 1.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.0M | $-27.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | $-31.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.1% | -5.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.0M | $7.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $-27.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $67.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.5M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.8M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $166.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $45.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.7M | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | $-31.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $58.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.8M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.9M | $-21.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | $153.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $29.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-46.8M | $-9.6M |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | -5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.0% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.5% | -1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | -3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.6% | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 11.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.52× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DNUT
Segment breakdown not available.
HI
| Transferred At Point In Time | $256.5M | 47% |
| Transferred Over Time | $207.1M | 38% |
| Molding Technology Solutions | $86.6M | 16% |
