vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($392.4M vs $199.6M, roughly 2.0× KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs -7.1%, a 15.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs -2.9%). Krispy Kreme, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.9M vs $-11.6M).
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is an American multinational doughnut company and coffeehouse chain. Krispy Kreme was founded by Vernon Rudolph (1915–1973), who bought a yeast-raised recipe from a New Orleans chef, rented a building in 1937 in what is now historic Old Salem in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and began selling to local grocery stores. Steady growth preceded an ambitious expansion as a public company in the period 2000 to 2016, which ultimately proved unprofitable. In 2016, the company retur...
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
DNUT vs KLIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $392.4M | $199.6M |
| Net Profit | $-27.8M | $16.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.6% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | 8.9% |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | 8.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.8% | -79.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $199.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $392.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-27.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-435.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 49.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.55 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $42.4M | $481.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $911.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $650.1M | $825.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $481.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $911.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $889.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $935.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $895.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $825.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.0M | $-8.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | $-11.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.1% | -5.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-11.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DNUT
Segment breakdown not available.
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |
