vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and Enpro Inc. (NPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($392.4M vs $295.4M, roughly 1.3× Enpro Inc.). Krispy Kreme, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -7.1% vs -10.8%, a 3.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Enpro Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.3% vs -2.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Enpro Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs -5.9%).
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is an American multinational doughnut company and coffeehouse chain. Krispy Kreme was founded by Vernon Rudolph (1915–1973), who bought a yeast-raised recipe from a New Orleans chef, rented a building in 1937 in what is now historic Old Salem in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and began selling to local grocery stores. Steady growth preceded an ambitious expansion as a public company in the period 2000 to 2016, which ultimately proved unprofitable. In 2016, the company retur...
Enpro is a US-based industrial technology company that designs and manufactures products and materials for technology-intensive sectors. The company serves industries such as semiconductors, aerospace, power generation, heavy-duty trucking, agricultural machinery, chemical processing, pulp and paper, and life sciences from 61 primary manufacturing facilities located in 12 countries, worldwide. It is organized under three segments: Sealing Technologies, Advanced Surface Technologies, and Engin...
DNUT vs NPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $392.4M | $295.4M |
| Net Profit | $-27.8M | $-32.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 42.1% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | 11.2% |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 14.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.8% | -330.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $-1.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $392.4M | $295.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.3M | $286.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.8M | $288.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.2M | $273.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.0M | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.9M | $260.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.8M | $271.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $442.7M | $257.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-27.8M | $-32.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.4M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-435.3M | $26.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.3M | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.4M | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.5M | $12.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 41.2% |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.4% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 17.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 10.9% |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.9% | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | $-1.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.55 | $1.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $1.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $1.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $42.4M | $114.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $911.9M | $655.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $650.1M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | $114.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $132.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $107.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | $240.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $236.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | $206.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | $175.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.1M | $163.9M |
| Q4 25 | $911.9M | $655.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $889.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $935.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.5M | $640.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $895.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $881.8M | $644.9M |
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $65.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.5M | $52.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.8M | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | $59.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $54.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $43.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.7M | $6.3M |
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $53.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.8M | $42.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.9M | $49.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | $48.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $38.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-46.8M | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.0% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.6% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 2.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DNUT
Segment breakdown not available.
NPO
| Sealing Technologies Segment | $187.0M | 63% |
| General Industrial | $71.3M | 24% |
| Power Generation | $19.9M | 7% |
| Oiland Gas Market | $15.0M | 5% |
| Semiconductors | $2.2M | 1% |
