vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($392.4M vs $349.1M, roughly 1.1× PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.). Krispy Kreme, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -7.1% vs -10.8%, a 3.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.6% vs -2.9%). PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($109.2M vs $27.9M). Over the past eight quarters, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs -5.9%).
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is an American multinational doughnut company and coffeehouse chain. Krispy Kreme was founded by Vernon Rudolph (1915–1973), who bought a yeast-raised recipe from a New Orleans chef, rented a building in 1937 in what is now historic Old Salem in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and began selling to local grocery stores. Steady growth preceded an ambitious expansion as a public company in the period 2000 to 2016, which ultimately proved unprofitable. In 2016, the company retur...
Procore Technologies is an American construction management software as a service company founded in 2002, with headquarters in Carpinteria, California. Procore hosts a platform to connect those involved in the construction industry on a global platform. The software allows for the creation of simplified workflows and displays a consolidated view of construction products that includes the tracking of tasks, management of project workflows, and scheduling.
DNUT vs PCOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $392.4M | $349.1M |
| Net Profit | $-27.8M | $-37.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 80.1% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | -12.3% |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.8% | 39.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $-0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $392.4M | $349.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.3M | $338.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.8M | $323.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.2M | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.0M | $302.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.9M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.8M | $284.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $442.7M | $269.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-27.8M | $-37.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.4M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-435.3M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.3M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.4M | $-62.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.5M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 80.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 79.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 81.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 81.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 83.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 83.0% |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.4% | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | -21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | -7.0% |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.6% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.9% | -4.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.55 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $42.4M | $768.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $911.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $650.1M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | $768.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $684.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $620.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | $566.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $775.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | $756.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | $735.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.1M | $744.6M |
| Q4 25 | $911.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $889.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $935.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $895.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $881.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.0M | $114.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | $109.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.1% | 31.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.0M | $282.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $114.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.5M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.8M | $66.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | $29.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $58.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.7M | $69.1M |
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | $109.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.8M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.9M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $56.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-46.8M | $67.1M |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.0% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.5% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.6% | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DNUT
Segment breakdown not available.
PCOR
| US | $298.3M | 85% |
| Non Us | $50.9M | 15% |